desertshox
All-Conference
the university doesnt ask the professors to mold their students to be the best students they can be and be ambassadors putting the university in the best possible light they can?Ok, that was just one example of a distinction.I fail to see the relevance in the amount of money they make being the reason one can remain hired and one can't.No idea. Probably some.I wonder how many university professors have DUI's and fly under the radar because they aren't a football coach.While I generally feel people fly too far off the handle about DUI, if the information about # of offenses and amount of BAC on this offense are true, then I don't see why the university would take on the potential liability.Firing a guy who has a drinking problem just makes an unemployed guy with a drinking problem. That doesn't help anyone. In fact, it is counterproductive.
Hopefully, Eichorst calls him in and tells him that he has taken his last drink and tell us what do you need from the University to get this fixed and behind you.
However, make it clear that his last drink has to be THE LAST DRINK.
If it's because of his value as a coach, I have to question (a) whether he can be effective as a leader of players if he shows such poor judgment, (b) has any credibility on the recruiting trail, especially in the face of negative recruiting, and © whether being a full time coach in the pressure cooker that is Nebraska football is the most conducive situation for recovery and bad behavior avoidance.
If the info is accurate, I don't see how he can be kept on, for his good or the good of the program.
Wonder how many of them make almost half a million in salary a year.
So, I fail to see the relevance.
What we ask of our coaches (and pay to them in exchange) is much more than we ask of professors. I think every rational person here recognizes that.
That said, if a professor was found guilty of a third DUI, I'd have to think that university would consider moving him/her on, even though the professor has much less responsibility for recruiting and developing students athletes than the highly paid football coach. one of the big arguments for firing a previous coach was that he appeared to embarrass the University. Here, a coach actually has (at least as that's perceived by most - I personally don't find it embarrassing). I'm sure if there were a professor of sufficient stature that anyone cared whether he/she got a DUI, the university would evaluate them in a similar manner because of the reputational impact. Simple reality is that there isn't.
ffs, this isnt about bo or his former staff. stop trying to turn it into being about him. their dismissals may be similar but since we dont know everything that went into the decision to part ways with them, their situations are not fully applicable here.