I suppose Dixon is #1?Lubik is putting in some work. Hardy was the #2 receiver on his board.
Yep.I suppose Dixon is #1?
Been a while, maybe one of our resident HS teachers can explain for us. @teachercd?Wow. How is 4.825 even possible? Good for him. Talent and smarts. I'll take it.
That is correct. Not all schools do that anymore but most do.Been a while, maybe one of our resident HS teachers can explain for us. @teachercd?
I thought if the kid is in advanced, or AP, classes, those classes are graded on a 5.0 scale. So a B in an AP class is = to an A in a regular class. Does that sound right?
That is correct. Not all schools do that anymore but most do.
Some schools ran into the "mommy problem" where a kid took an AP (oh honors)class, got an A (5 points)and a study hall, while another kid took an AP class got an A (5 points) and band, got an A (4 points) and missed out on being valedictorian because their Band "A" was only 4 points.
So parents freaked the f#&% out.
For sure...it is over the top BUT it also needs to be changed. Just make it simple...and only count the same number of weighted classes for each student.I get that it seems over the top but you're basically telling the kids that if they want to have a legit shot at valedictorian you can't be in band, take extra gym classes, take electives like robotics etc.
The class above me in high school a girl won out valedictorian because she took a special pass/fail gym class over the summer, only because if it was during the year it would have been only worth 4.0. The people she beat out took it during the year did everything else right (not take band, not take unnecessary electives, maximum study halls, etc) but their GPAs were still deluded because they weren't strategic enough to take the special pass/ fail gym over the summer like she was. Seemed like a silly way to determine valedictorian.
A lot of schools have done away with it completely, like you said.Or... Like many schools, end the elitist tradition of having to boast on 2 students. Val's & Sal's post HS accomplishments rarely result in more success then other class members. Sometimes, yes but that is not the norm. As a community we frown on "Look At Me or Look At My Accomplishments" boasts so why do we promote that agenda with our youth?
Sports is different though, because unless you are talking about sports like wrestling, golf, track, swimming...it is clear who is better, so no amount of parent b!^@hing really matters...Your kid shoots a 10 over and Timmy shoots 5 over...Timmy is playing in the tourney. Same with Wrestling...you either win your wrestle off or you don't.@teachercd until it's manipulated in one way or another. In many instances its the "Haves" that benefit while the "Have nots" are more deserving.
Sports in general is a very good example. I've seen and heard of the scenario where coachs are forced to start lesser players because parents of the lesser players have put thousands of dollars into the athlete thru select sports. (baseball, volleyball, softball, basketball) Parents believe they should have a voice in their child's sport because they've (the haves) spent thousands on their child's development. The parentsfeetfeel their child should start even if the better athlete who isn't in select sports (parents can't afford it, the have nots) is more deserving.