WR Wan'Dale Robinson [Nebraska - Signed LOI]

To Which School Will Robinson Commit?

  • Total voters
    106
https://n.rivals.com/news/all-american-bowl-whose-stock-is-on-the-move

Stock up-

"Throughout the week of practice it was obvious Robinson was going to have a key role in Saturday’s game with the play designs the coaching staff set up for the future Nebraska Cornhusker. Right off the bat Robinson made his impact felt, returning the opening kickoff out to the 37-yard line and then tucking and running for five yards on the game’s first offensive play after an attempted double-pass that broke down. Robinson would finish the game with four receptions for 91 yards."

 
Who is Tyler Brooke of Bleacher Report, grading Wandale Robinson a C? A C???!!! Really? He was one of the stars of stars in this game. Wandale was clearly the best open-field runner out there, and he was as good as the best receivers out there. This guy is crazy. He’s fired!

 
Pedro G said:
Who is Tyler Brooke of Bleacher Report, grading Wandale Robinson a C? A C???!!! Really? He was one of the stars of stars in this game. Wandale was clearly the best open-field runner out there, and he was as good as the best receivers out there. This guy is crazy. He’s fired!
Click to expand...
Your problem is you use bleacher report

 
Pedro G said:
Who is Tyler Brooke of Bleacher Report, grading Wandale Robinson a C? A C???!!! Really? He was one of the stars of stars in this game. Wandale was clearly the best open-field runner out there, and he was as good as the best receivers out there. This guy is crazy. He’s fired!
Click to expand...
Well he went to Indiana, so he doesn't know what good football looks like

 
Pedro G said:
Wrong. I was browsing online and found the article. I have never subscribed to it, and never had read their stuff before. 
Click to expand...
Yet you took the time to read it, be upset about it, and rant about it here. Again, your problem was you're reading bleacher report

 
Swiv3D said:
Yet you took the time to read it, be upset about it, and rant about it here. Again, your problem was you're reading bleacher report
Click to expand...
Why does it matter to you if I read it when I didn’t know the quality of the publication? What’s the big deal? You could had pointed out to me this is a poor-quality publication and left it at that rather than start a silly argument. Right? 

 
Pedro G said:
Why does it matter to you if I read it when I didn’t know the quality of the publication? What’s the big deal? You could had pointed out to me this is a poor-quality publication and left it at that rather than start a silly argument. Right? 
Click to expand...
My intention wasnt to start an argument, just to state that your problem is that you use bleacher report

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Haha
Reactions: GSG
I mean he only rated 17 players so the difference between A and C+ isn't that big. The take away is he has Wandale as one of the top 12-13 guys in a game with the best in the country regardless of position, not the letter grade.

Smile, relax.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
spurs1990 said:
I mean he only rated 17 players so the difference between A and C+ isn't that big. The take away is he has Wandale as one of the top 12-13 guys in a game with the best in the country regardless of position, not the letter grade.

Smile, relax.
Click to expand...


giphy.gif


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top