Did OU, OSU, or Florida have new starting QB's in those years?
No, but the Miami Hurricanes, if I recall correctly, won all of their national titles in the 80's with first year starters at QB.
:box
Now to the point of the thread, can the Husker win the '09 national champioship? Yes, no and maybe.
Here's why the Huskers could win it all in '09:
* The defense should be in the top 20 overall.
* The offense will take a slight step back from last year but should still be very productive.
* The attitude, confidence and belief in themselves is there.
* The Huskers get Oklahoma and Texas Tech in Lincoln.
Here's why the Huskers won't win it all in '09:
* They'd have to beat TT and OU during the season and then play one of those teams, or Texas, for the Big 12 title-just to get to the NC.
* Rarely do all of those funny little bounces of the ball go a certain team's way.
* The schedule is just too tough.
* There are too many question marks: DT-who will step up and help out Suh, WR-can Paul, Brooks, Holt, Henery, etc finally step up?
Here's why the Huskers could maybe win it all in '09:
* Maybe this is the year where those quicky bounces, calls by the refs, etc go our way.
* Maybe the WR's: Paul, Brooks, Holt, Henery, etc step up and have awesome years.
* If the WR's do that then that'll greatly help out our TE's.
* Maybe Steinkuhler and Crick demonstrate there's no drop-off from Suh at the DT spot.
* Maybe Zach Lee could actually be better than Joe Ganz.
:wacko:
:dumdum