Did Bo concentrate too much on scheme?

[Count 'Bility]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Just to say, Perlman wasnt Chancellor until 3 1/2 years after Osborne quit coaching.

 

[NUpolo8]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Considering Perlman wasn't an interim chancellor until 2000 and was officially named in 01, I'd say you're alluding to something else.

 

[NUpolo8]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Just to say, Perlman wasnt Chancellor until 3 1/2 years after Osborne quit coaching.

You and I are an alliance!

 

[zoogs]

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

Indeed. And it's not just players that have been fed this.

 

[Count 'Bility]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Just to say, Perlman wasnt Chancellor until 3 1/2 years after Osborne quit coaching.

You and I are an alliance!

I'm here for the facts yo. Take it back.

 

[StPaulHusker]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Considering Perlman wasn't an interim chancellor until 2000 and was officially named in 01, I'd say you're alluding to something else.

Yeah but Osborne's guys became Solich's guys while Pearlman was Chancellor. What do you have to say about THAT?!?!

 

[Count 'Bility]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Considering Perlman wasn't an interim chancellor until 2000 and was officially named in 01, I'd say you're alluding to something else.

Yeah but Osborne's guys became Solich's guys while Pearlman was Chancellor. What do you have to say about THAT?!?!

Very VERY few. The 2001 5TH YEAR seniors wouldve been the only Osborne guys to have played during the Perlamn chancelling era.

 

[Saunders]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Considering Perlman wasn't an interim chancellor until 2000 and was officially named in 01, I'd say you're alluding to something else.

No... you're saying that the players are being brainwashed (fed information) by coaches with questionable motives, because they worked for Harvey. Hence my asking if players under Osborne were subject to that, since there are those who share the same opinions.

 

[NUpolo8]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Considering Perlman wasn't an interim chancellor until 2000 and was officially named in 01, I'd say you're alluding to something else.

Yeah but Osborne's guys became Solich's guys while Pearlman was Chancellor. What do you have to say about THAT?!?!

Very VERY few. The 2001 5TH YEAR seniors wouldve been the only Osborne guys to have played during the Perlamn chancelling era.

Who says Dahrran Diedrick didn't have CLOUT?

 

[NUpolo8]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Considering Perlman wasn't an interim chancellor until 2000 and was officially named in 01, I'd say you're alluding to something else.

No... you're saying that the players are being brainwashed (fed information) by coaches with questionable motives, because they worked for Harvey. Hence my asking if players under Osborne were subject to that, since there are those who share the same opinions.

No, I'm saying you're talking out of your a$$ and are wrong. Try to keep up.

 

[Count 'Bility]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Considering Perlman wasn't an interim chancellor until 2000 and was officially named in 01, I'd say you're alluding to something else.

Yeah but Osborne's guys became Solich's guys while Pearlman was Chancellor. What do you have to say about THAT?!?!

Very VERY few. The 2001 5TH YEAR seniors wouldve been the only Osborne guys to have played during the Perlamn chancelling era.

Who says Dahrran Diedrick didn't have CLOUT?

What about Troy Hassebroek and Ben Zajicek then?

 

[Saunders]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Considering Perlman wasn't an interim chancellor until 2000 and was officially named in 01, I'd say you're alluding to something else.

No... you're saying that the players are being brainwashed (fed information) by coaches with questionable motives, because they worked for Harvey. Hence my asking if players under Osborne were subject to that, since there are those who share the same opinions.

No, I'm saying you're talking out of your a$$ and are wrong. Try to keep up.

You're welcome to have your opinion, sans personal attacks. But off the top of my head, Frazier, Vrzal, Foreman, Moore, and Zatchka (all guys I listen to on podcasts) have said one way or another, that there's some issues with Harvey, his ego, and the football program.

 

[NUpolo8]

Sker aint lying, but he seems to be greatly exaggerating the importance of this, cuz frankly I, as well as many others probably, dont (and shouldnt) give a sh#t.

The tension between Osborne and Perlman is hurting the football program.

Both parties (yes, i said BOTH. Take 2 to tango) should let it go then. Get over it.

It's not just Osborne, it's the football program. I've heard (and read) current and former players allude to Harvey's axe grinding.

If the football players are actively worried about the chancellor, then their focus is way off or they're being fed something they shouldn't be by a coach.

You can apply that to guys on the team, not guys that graduated a decade ago.

Not necessarily, we've had coaches with questionable motives for awhile, including. Bo Pelini in 03.

So what about the Osborne guys?

Considering Perlman wasn't an interim chancellor until 2000 and was officially named in 01, I'd say you're alluding to something else.

Yeah but Osborne's guys became Solich's guys while Pearlman was Chancellor. What do you have to say about THAT?!?!

Very VERY few. The 2001 5TH YEAR seniors wouldve been the only Osborne guys to have played during the Perlamn chancelling era.

Who says Dahrran Diedrick didn't have CLOUT?

What about Troy Hassebroek and Ben Zajicek then?

If you did that off memory, I'm impressed.

 

[True2tRA]

Gotta have guys play within the system, period.

When Bo had the horses, his defenses were absolutely SICK. There were games and whole stretches of seasons where his defenses just crushed opponents. His scheme was solid and earned him respect and a pretty penny.

Personally I believe that unless he had the right horses, his scheme could be exposed. Or, if a matchup on a certain player favored the opposition it was exposed. If a player busted a play, it was exposed.

In college ball, a missed assignment will happen quite often; or a player might not have a good matchup. So yeah, Bo's scheme was brilliant and Bo's scheme was suspect. When it was on, it was juice. When it was off--- he gets fired.

He needed the horses and at times he had em and it was fun. But in college you have too much turnover for his scheme.

Any defense with Ndamukong Suh on it is probably going to have success. DT is the best place to have your best player. Once in a lifetime player really. LaVonte David covered up a lot of issues in his own right also. Probably why he broke records.
I'd be willing to bet you a lot of money that Ndamukong Suh and LaVonte David were playing outside the scheme more often than they were playing within it.

 

[BigRedBuster]

Gotta have guys play within the system, period.

When Bo had the horses, his defenses were absolutely SICK. There were games and whole stretches of seasons where his defenses just crushed opponents. His scheme was solid and earned him respect and a pretty penny.

Personally I believe that unless he had the right horses, his scheme could be exposed. Or, if a matchup on a certain player favored the opposition it was exposed. If a player busted a play, it was exposed.

In college ball, a missed assignment will happen quite often; or a player might not have a good matchup. So yeah, Bo's scheme was brilliant and Bo's scheme was suspect. When it was on, it was juice. When it was off--- he gets fired.

He needed the horses and at times he had em and it was fun. But in college you have too much turnover for his scheme.

Any defense with Ndmakong Suh on it is probably going to have success. DT is the best place to have your best player. Once in a lifetime player really. LaVonte David covered up a lot of issues in his own right also. Probably why he broke records.

I'd be willing to bet you a lot of money that Ndamukong Suh and LaVonte David were playing outside the scheme more often than they were playing within it.

Nice making a bet that nobody has the ability to prove either way.