Are Husker Fans Lowering Their Expectations?

Eric the Red

Team HuskerBoard
Are Husker Fans Lowering Their Expectations?

Callahan `hot seat' comment creates quite the stir

June 1, 2007

By Trev Alberts

Special to CSTV.com

TREV ALBERTS

Trev Alberts is a football analyst for CSTV and CSTV.com.

E-mail here!

You've got college football questions and CSTV football analyst Trev Alberts has answers and opinions. Each week Alberts will be answering questions and queries on the world of college football. So if you've got a question for Trev, just ask him.

Why as a former player and fan of Husker football have you said that Coach Callahan is on the hot seat. I agree with you that he does need to start winning these big games soon...but Trev come on. I hope you understand that you have hurt the program and have really made people who are Nebraska fans, and always been supportive of you, question why you wrote this. It is going to be very difficult for NU to get a good coach in here after Callahan if he does not get a lot of time to turn this thing around. You know from the 1st coaching search that it was tough to find any good candidates to even consider going to NU because of the unreal expectations and pressure on the coaching staff. Please in the future do not add fuel to the fire on this topic as we have a small but focal segment that want Callahan and Pederson gone. And if that does transpire I am afraid Husker football will take decades to get back to a prominent power again. - Dan Schomaker

We of course had outstanding feedback from Nebraska fans this week, but there weren't very many questions posed and I'll start this week's mailbag off with this statement: I might indeed have lost touch with Nebraska football in some respects because somewhere between three or four years ago, apparently expectations have been lowered.

Let me state for the record that I am a huge Nebraska fan and I have a large investment into that place. I want nothing but championship level effort and results. But the day that Nebraskans, their fans, their coaches and their players ever lower their expectations and demands of excellence will be the end of the Nebraska that I knew.

I had the privilege of narrating a three parts series that many Huskers fans have on the history of Nebraska football. In doing that narration is when I really learned, to a great extent, how Nebraska had no tolerance for substandard performance, period. There were no exceptions because the state and its people defined itself by the success of the football program. I'm not saying that's necessarily right, but that was reality. It was stunning to me how it didn't matter who the coach was in that he was given an opportunity, a fair opportunity, and if he didn't get it done they found somebody who did.

This isn't a Frank Solich vs. Bill Callahan argument. I've read many of the posts, the threads, the blogs, and I'm not sure people remember me sitting at a desk in a studio at a competing network saying it was the right move to go in a different direction. I've had some reservations how Solich's firing was handled, but please don't try and turn this into an "I'm disappointed Solich isn't still the head coach." If Solich didn't get the job done, it was time for somebody to get it done. On a totally different matter, you could argue the point of whether or not Solich got the job done.

But when I came up with the names of those on the "hot seat" last week, it never was supposed to be a list of coaches who ought to be fired. The point is this: Callahan finds himself in the same position that other coaches that preceded him found themselves in. This is year No. 4 and it's time to produce. Nobody said he's not going to get it done. Let's not forget Steve Pederson essentially saying Nebraska wasn't going to play second fiddle to Kansas State and Texas. That statement comes under the premise of why Solich was fired.

Now, Nebraska has changed the program and if someone said that Callahan was on the hot seat after his first year that would be ludicrous. After year two, it would probably be ludicrous as well. After year three, I think it is fair for the coach to feel some pressure after we've been told to remain patient while the regime's own recruits mature and play a more prominent role. They've now brought in highly ranked recruiting classes, an All-American quarterback candidate in Sam Keller, who himself has said he looks forward to the day when he's introduced on Monday Night Football and can say, "Sam Keller, University of Nebraska." They've had years to get their specific players in, they play in a very weak North Division of the Big 12, which is probably the fourth weakest conference in the game.

All I've merely said all along is that there are no more excuses. This is the year, according to Nebraska football history, that will define and basically characterize what this regime is going to be about. I think that's fair.

I didn't say I didn't like Bill Callahan, or how difficult it is to change from an option based attack to a West Coast offense. But it is year No. 4. And I never said they weren't making progress. There's been progress, but it should be fairly easy to make progress with a stable staff, all the recruits, new facilities and having everything in place they supposedly need. Steve Pederson has done everything for Bill Callahan, bending over backwards for him. All I've said is that a seven win season, according to what I used to think the expectations were, is unacceptable. I guess I've lost touch because when Solich won only seven games that state was in a complete uproar.

When Nebraska won nine games last season, people said the Huskers were back. But that was only the fourth best record in 40 years of Nebraska. Back in the day, if you didn't win nine games, then they were considered terrible. I might have lost touch, which is my fault by not being there on a more regular basis. I didn't know that the expectations were different now than they used to be. If they are, I sincerely apologize.

This isn't a statement that I want Steve Pederson fired or Bill Callahan fired or Frank Solich back coaching or Tom Osborne. This is not a Bill Callahan issue or a Steve Pederson issue. I fully understand how difficult their jobs are. But when I read blogs that say when Nebraska wins seven games that they're getting better, I'm flabbergasted that they're lowering expectations and how effective they've been at doing such. There was a time when Nebraska lost and the state went into mourning for a week. I hope Nebraska fans haven't become callous to losing. There used to be a demand for excellence.

There will come a time, and I don't care who it is, when a coach will come under fire. There will come a time when Charlie Weis, if he keeps losing too many more games to Michigan or getting blown out in bowl games, will be on the hot seat at Notre Dame, and eventually he'll be shown the door.

And getting back to the original email, just because the coaching search last time wasn't handled correctly, and was ineffective, doesn't mean there aren't people dying to come coach at Nebraska.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
in yo face. :) gee trev how do you really feel?

I've never lowered my expectations but without the players it's hard to say we have a shot at the nc with 2,3 or four losses. Doesn't mean I don't want to see back to back undefeated seasons. NU football is a reality show on a personal level. Are we disappointed YES but I still expect the team to start showing signs of domination again. Like the 90's sure it would be great but not too realistic.

GBR

 
I have high expectations and very high hopes, however, I'm also a realist. Expecting to duplicate the domination of the 90's is unrealistic but not undoable. It could happen again but that's an unrealistic standard for success. I expect NU to be able to compete with the elite teams and play consistant high caliber football that causes NU to be recognized as a force. Right now I feel like were pretty much a second tier team and expect us to break into the first tier. I'll believe we're back in the elite ranks when we start beating teams like OU, USC, UT .... We lost to the elites last year and just as easily could have had some wins against them. On the other hand we had a couple games we could easily have dropped. We had to pull a rabbit out of the hat or get lucky. I feel like we're about right on the hump. I think we're on the verge of getting over the hump. Our loses last year were against good teams. We need to win some of those on a consistant basis.

 
The team is just now getting to the point where all the players are all Callahan's, and almost everyone will be disappointed if we don't win the Big 12. How is that lowered expectations? If anything, considering the way Callahan is recruiting we're probably going to be almost a permanent fixture in the CCG, at least for the foreseeable future.

 
This should be the year that we really begin to see the team that Callahan invisions. He has all of his guys in there and as long as the guys excute things correctly we should see some major improvement in out team IMO.

 
This should be the year that we really begin to see the team that Callahan invisions. He has all of his guys in there and as long as the guys excute things correctly we should see some major improvement in out team IMO.
You're absolutely right. There are no excuses this year. So what happens if there is no improvement? Will you be satisfied with a 5 loss season?

If your answer is "yes", then you've lowered your expectations.

If your answer is "no", they you're agreeing that he should be on the hot seat.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This should be the year that we really begin to see the team that Callahan invisions. He has all of his guys in there and as long as the guys excute things correctly we should see some major improvement in out team IMO.
You're absolutely right. There are no excuses this year. So what happens if there is no improvement? Will you be satisfied with a 5 loss season?

If your answer is "yes", then you've lowered your expectations.

If your answer is "no", they you're agreeing that he should be on the hot seat.
No I would not be happy with another 5 loss season. Anything below a Big XII Championship is a disappointment in my book. ;)

 
while i won't be happy with 4 or 5 losses it is entirely possible. Keller did NOT grow up in this system, he has not thrown to all the wide outs and they are less than satisfactory by anyone's measure, period.

i give the guy 2-3 more years. the whole parity issue is extreme, nothing like when Trev was around at all. the SEC is a kick a$$ conference with USC, OSU and others always in the chase. plus, the Hollywood factor (playing for USC, ND, ETC.) is bigger than ever for these kids trying to get to the NFL, so recruiting in the "Corn" is tough business. Cally's play calling can be a pain-in-the-a$$, but all in all, his recruiting job is extremely difficult and without the horses, we can't be in the race!

 
I am a little amazed at the expectations. Going from some talent and no depth during the years of Solich, to what we have now.

But there still are a lot of Franks kids here. Are they as good as what BC will bring in the next couple of years to replace them? who knows.

But being realistic, which I have always claimed to be, we really do not have a chance at the Big 12 Conference championship. You can rag all you want about recruiting, and how great we are doing, bullsh#t!! We are doing fantastic for Nebraska, but not even on the same page as the top programs. Until we get the ones they want, rather than them taking everyone we want, we will not be ready to compete. First string against first string possibly, but depth is what is killing the team. BC is working on getting it, but it takes time. I think he gets it done, but I do not put a time limit on it

We are playing with two running backs that may be able to play or may not. We are playing with a new QB that has never been on the field at Nebraska, never taken a snap in a real game with Nebraska's offense. A QB that had questionable performances prior. I still say I will be amazed if he is here in the fall. We have a totally new Defensive line, and we could not win the Big 12 with two DE drafted rather high. The replacements are a reach at best. LIne bakcers are still slow, Bowman may never see the field, and we have minute CB's that Texas, Oklahoma and Oklahoma state ate alive last year.

Realistic, winning the North, a chance at the Big 12 Championship, but no certain deal. Not enough talent on the field, not enough play makers, not enough depth.

You need to take off the Husker glasses and see just how much this staff has accomplished and where I think they are heade. NO ONE WINS JUST BECAYSE THEY ARE NEBRASKA, USC, TEXAS OR ANY PLACE ELSE. It takes the talent to win and currently we are still quite aways behind.

If TO was taking the field with this team, it would be considered a rebuilding year, with high hopes.

Get off of BC's back and support what he is doing, quit whining about Frank, it has been over for a long time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
while i won't be happy with 4 or 5 losses it is entirely possible. Keller did NOT grow up in this system, he has not thrown to all the wide outs and they are less than satisfactory by anyone's measure, period.

i give the guy 2-3 more years. the whole parity issue is extreme, nothing like when Trev was around at all. the SEC is a kick a$$ conference with USC, OSU and others always in the chase. plus, the Hollywood factor (playing for USC, ND, ETC.) is bigger than ever for these kids trying to get to the NFL, so recruiting in the "Corn" is tough business. Cally's play calling can be a pain-in-the-a$$, but all in all, his recruiting job is extremely difficult and without the horses, we can't be in the race!
So it that your way of saying you have lowered your expectations?

And just FTR, I don't think it necessarily means you're not a real fan if you have, because some of what you're saying is the reality of college football today. OTOH, I'll never give Callahan a free pass on his stupid playcalling like you seem willing to do.

 
FS and BC have alot in common.

They both took someone elses players to the championship game, and lost.

 
Wow, I'm not sure where to start with this one, but there's way too much ammo for me to ignore.

I am a little amazed at the expectations. Going from some talent and no depth during the years of Solich, to what we have now.
What do we have now?

But there still are a lot of Franks kids here. Are they as good as what BC will bring in the next couple of years to replace them? who knows.
Oh, they sure as hell better be, because IIRC the main argument for Frank being fired was the dropoff in quality of recruits.

But being realistic, which I have always claimed to be, we really do not have a chance at the Big 12 Conference championship. You can rag all you want about recruiting, and how great we are doing, bullsh#t!! We are doing fantastic for Nebraska, but not even on the same page as the top programs. Until we get the ones they want, rather than them taking everyone we want, we will not be ready to compete. First string against first string possibly, but depth is what is killing the team. BC is working on getting it, but it takes time. I think he gets it done, but I do not put a time limit on it
Why did Frank get a time limit on it, but BC doesn't?

We are playing with two running backs that may be able to play or may not. We are playing with a new QB that has never been on the field at Nebraska, never taken a snap in a real game with Nebraska's offense. A QB that had questionable performances prior. I still say I will be amazed if he is here in the fall. We have a totally new Defensive line, and we could not win the Big 12 with two DE drafted rather high. The replacements are a reach at best. LIne bakcers are still slow, Bowman may never see the field, and we have minute CB's that Texas, Oklahoma and Oklahoma state ate alive last year.

Realistic, winning the North, a chance at the Big 12 Championship, but no certain deal. Not enough talent on the field, not enough play makers, not enough depth.
Go back and re-read the second sentence of your post.

Get off of BC's back
No.

quit whining about Frank
I will, when the same expectations that he was held to, are applied to BC as well.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
while i won't be happy with 4 or 5 losses it is entirely possible. Keller did NOT grow up in this system, he has not thrown to all the wide outs and they are less than satisfactory by anyone's measure, period.

i give the guy 2-3 more years. the whole parity issue is extreme, nothing like when Trev was around at all. the SEC is a kick a$$ conference with USC, OSU and others always in the chase. plus, the Hollywood factor (playing for USC, ND, ETC.) is bigger than ever for these kids trying to get to the NFL, so recruiting in the "Corn" is tough business. Cally's play calling can be a pain-in-the-a$$, but all in all, his recruiting job is extremely difficult and without the horses, we can't be in the race!
So it that your way of saying you have lowered your expectations?

And just FTR, I don't think it necessarily means you're not a real fan if you have, because some of what you're saying is the reality of college football today. OTOH, I'll never give Callahan a free pass on his stupid play calling like you seem willing to do.

hell no, i don't give him a free pass on stupid play calling, i expect him to improve immensely! but he needs to continue to recruit well, as Skers has said, to even have a chance.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Frank Solich is gone and we'll never run the option again. PERIOD. If you don't like that fine, but quit whining and complaining about it all of the time. If you want what we had, go watch Ohio. They're desperate for fan support. If you want to stick around and watch a devoloping program, then sit back, enjoy and support it.

 
Back
Top