hastingshusker
Special Teams Player
On ESPN they just flashed he is suspended Indefinitely on suspicion of DUI.
Are you kidding me?i say he is suspended until he has had his day in court. and if he is found guilty, then he is gone. if he is found innocent then he is allowed to play afterwards.
Fact: He was driving.
Fact: He was drunk.
He doesn't have a snowball's chance in H-E-double hockey sticks of being found innocent. I doubt this will even go to trial.
Now you're reaching.He deserves his chance in court. That's his constitutional right. Maybe his lawyer gets him off due to a technicallity. Maybe a cop had it out for him? We don't know. They haven't released his BAC level.Are you kidding me?i say he is suspended until he has had his day in court. and if he is found guilty, then he is gone. if he is found innocent then he is allowed to play afterwards.
Fact: He was driving.
Fact: He was drunk.
He doesn't have a snowball's chance in H-E-double hockey sticks of being found innocent. I doubt this will even go to trial.
It's not a big deal? Are you people for real? Are you going to think it's no big deal when a drunk driver kills one of your family members if the driver was "close" to the legal limit?Theres always the chance that if he was close enough to the legal limit when he blew where he was pulled over that by the time he got to the detox tank and blood was taken and tested that he could contest the initial reading and get off... Well thats what I heard on the radio... so we'll have to wait and see.
I just dont think it is as big as a deal after hearing the whole story. Trust me players on this team do a lot worse things and drink just as much. Purify just was unlucky and got nailed twice in a short span. He needs to be smarter about his drinking for sure, and probably just stop for the rest of his time here at Nebraska, but when I hear that he has a drinking problem I just don't believe it. He's a college student, they drink, if you are in college or have been I'm sure you drank and have done stupid things.
WHAT? Not a snow balls chance in HELL, are you kidding me? All you need to do is look at the court records and you will see that there are a lot of these types of cases that get dismissed or reduced for any number of reasons. Ask a group of police officers and ask them how many times they have had a case dismissed.Are you kidding me?i say he is suspended until he has had his day in court. and if he is found guilty, then he is gone. if he is found innocent then he is allowed to play afterwards.
Fact: He was driving.
Fact: He was drunk.
He doesn't have a snowball's chance in H-E-double hockey sticks of being found innocent. I doubt this will even go to trial.
Anyone else think it's a b!^@h he got pulled over for not putting on his blinker
Anyways, suspend him for 4 games.
Everyone I know who has ever got one has paid dearly. Sure, there may be some exceptions but I'd imagine they are few and far between, and FTR getting the charge reduced ISN'T being found innocent.WHAT? Not a snow balls chance in HELL, are you kidding me? All you need to do is look at the court records and you will see that there are a lot of these types of cases that get dismissed or reduced for any number of reasons. Ask a group of police officers and ask them how many times they have had a case dismissed.
Now with that said, I will agree with what ever BC decides. My patience is wearing thin with this guy. :madash
He was also speeding.Anyone else think it's a b!^@h he got pulled over for not putting on his blinker
Anyways, suspend him for 4 games.
Did I say getting the charge reduced was saying he was innocent, I can't seem to see that part in my post. I was just stating that there are a lot of DUI cases that get dismissed or reduced in response to your post where you said there was not a snowballs chance in hell.Everyone I know who has ever got one has paid dearly. Sure, there may be some exceptions but I'd imagine they are few and far between, and FTR getting the charge reduced ISN'T being found innocent.WHAT? Not a snow balls chance in HELL, are you kidding me? All you need to do is look at the court records and you will see that there are a lot of these types of cases that get dismissed or reduced for any number of reasons. Ask a group of police officers and ask them how many times they have had a case dismissed.
Now with that said, I will agree with what ever BC decides. My patience is wearing thin with this guy. :madash
Speak for yourself, I know myself and a few others weren't defending him after his first incident.I won't question the decision if he gets kicked off. But I wonder why everyone is jumping to support that decision when we were defending him after his first incident? If he was not even going to get suspended at all after the bar incident, why does a DUI push it to "kicked off the team"? There seems to be a little non sequitur there, even if it is a repeat offense. I thought no suspension would be too lenient in that first case, and considerable suspension is deserved at this point. But I also think if he can prove himself somehow, he can work his way back to an amount of respectability that he can be on the Husker team again. I don't know - I don't know any prior examples of players getting DUIs.
Perhaps you should re-read the original post then.Did I say getting the charge reduced was saying he was innocent, I can't seem to see that part in my post. I was just stating that there are a lot of DUI cases that get dismissed or reduced in response to your post where you said there was not a snowballs chance in hell.
I never said there wasn't a snowballs chance in hell the charges would get reduced.Are you kidding me?
Fact: He was driving.
Fact: He was drunk.
He doesn't have a snowball's chance in H-E-double hockey sticks of being found innocent. I doubt this will even go to trial.