You're BC, Whats Your Punishment.

1 Game

  • 2 Games

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3 Games

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4 Games

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5 Games

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6 or More Games

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Off The Team

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Clean Up The Stadium (Joe Pa Style)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
i say he is suspended until he has had his day in court. and if he is found guilty, then he is gone. if he is found innocent then he is allowed to play afterwards.
Are you kidding me?

Fact: He was driving.

Fact: He was drunk.

He doesn't have a snowball's chance in H-E-double hockey sticks of being found innocent. I doubt this will even go to trial.

Theres always the chance that if he was close enough to the legal limit when he blew where he was pulled over that by the time he got to the detox tank and blood was taken and tested that he could contest the initial reading and get off... Well thats what I heard on the radio... so we'll have to wait and see.

I just dont think it is as big as a deal after hearing the whole story. Trust me players on this team do a lot worse things and drink just as much. Purify just was unlucky and got nailed twice in a short span. He needs to be smarter about his drinking for sure, and probably just stop for the rest of his time here at Nebraska, but when I hear that he has a drinking problem I just don't believe it. He's a college student, they drink, if you are in college or have been I'm sure you drank and have done stupid things.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reading the other posts here...I'll hope for the best (that he gets off or whatever) but I think he'll be out for the non-conference schedule (so 4 games). I sort of think if this spirals and there is lot of negative info./facts that come out about this episode (i.e. he was way over the limit, resisted, was non-cooperative, etc.) than he is gone completely...we can't let NU take a PR dive for this one guy's stupidity. :madash

 
He has to go. I'm still hearing crap about LP and the Peter bros. We don't need that rep again.

 
i say he is suspended until he has had his day in court. and if he is found guilty, then he is gone. if he is found innocent then he is allowed to play afterwards.
Are you kidding me?

Fact: He was driving.

Fact: He was drunk.

He doesn't have a snowball's chance in H-E-double hockey sticks of being found innocent. I doubt this will even go to trial.
He deserves his chance in court. That's his constitutional right. Maybe his lawyer gets him off due to a technicallity. Maybe a cop had it out for him? We don't know. They haven't released his BAC level.
Now you're reaching.

I thought I heard he was twice the legal limit on the radio but I haven't heard it anywhere elso so I could be mistaken as far as that goes. Let me assure you and everyone else, no law enforcement agency makes a habit of charging people with DUI when they're not drunk.

 
Theres always the chance that if he was close enough to the legal limit when he blew where he was pulled over that by the time he got to the detox tank and blood was taken and tested that he could contest the initial reading and get off... Well thats what I heard on the radio... so we'll have to wait and see.

I just dont think it is as big as a deal after hearing the whole story. Trust me players on this team do a lot worse things and drink just as much. Purify just was unlucky and got nailed twice in a short span. He needs to be smarter about his drinking for sure, and probably just stop for the rest of his time here at Nebraska, but when I hear that he has a drinking problem I just don't believe it. He's a college student, they drink, if you are in college or have been I'm sure you drank and have done stupid things.
It's not a big deal? Are you people for real? Are you going to think it's no big deal when a drunk driver kills one of your family members if the driver was "close" to the legal limit?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I lost my younger brother to a drunk driver. I know the pain of it. I lost my best friend in High School driving drunk.

But kids make mistakes. I really do not know the whole story, being in SoCal, not hearing anything about it other than what is said here. I think BC is a good judge of character, and if he decides to keep him then there is a reason that none of us will ever know.

I know college kids drink and I know young military people drink, the unlucky ones get caught.

To me driving drunk is just like walking into bar drunk with a 45 and shooting up the place. The only difference is the size of the projectile. I have very little sympathy for drunk drivers. Youth normally clouds judgement, and I would most likely be willing to give him another chance if he agreed and stayed by certain requirements. BC will make the right decision. Really nothing we say has a bearing on the situation, but I do not want him to stay for the team. I want him to stay if it will help him grow and become an adult and learn from this. He is not needed in any way. But he may need us.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i say he is suspended until he has had his day in court. and if he is found guilty, then he is gone. if he is found innocent then he is allowed to play afterwards.
Are you kidding me?

Fact: He was driving.

Fact: He was drunk.

He doesn't have a snowball's chance in H-E-double hockey sticks of being found innocent. I doubt this will even go to trial.
WHAT? Not a snow balls chance in HELL, are you kidding me? All you need to do is look at the court records and you will see that there are a lot of these types of cases that get dismissed or reduced for any number of reasons. Ask a group of police officers and ask them how many times they have had a case dismissed.

Now with that said, I will agree with what ever BC decides. My patience is wearing thin with this guy. :madash

 
Anyone else think it's a b!^@h he got pulled over for not putting on his blinker

Anyways, suspend him for 4 games.

What!!!

No turn signals?

That's it!..I really hate that most drivers out here don't use their turn signals.

He needs Jail time!

And who drinks 5 weeks after getting in trouble associated with being drunk before?

I can't even drink more than 4 beers at a time 20years after my motorcycle accident that was alcohol influenced.

 
WHAT? Not a snow balls chance in HELL, are you kidding me? All you need to do is look at the court records and you will see that there are a lot of these types of cases that get dismissed or reduced for any number of reasons. Ask a group of police officers and ask them how many times they have had a case dismissed.

Now with that said, I will agree with what ever BC decides. My patience is wearing thin with this guy. :madash
Everyone I know who has ever got one has paid dearly. Sure, there may be some exceptions but I'd imagine they are few and far between, and FTR getting the charge reduced ISN'T being found innocent.

 
WHAT? Not a snow balls chance in HELL, are you kidding me? All you need to do is look at the court records and you will see that there are a lot of these types of cases that get dismissed or reduced for any number of reasons. Ask a group of police officers and ask them how many times they have had a case dismissed.

Now with that said, I will agree with what ever BC decides. My patience is wearing thin with this guy. :madash
Everyone I know who has ever got one has paid dearly. Sure, there may be some exceptions but I'd imagine they are few and far between, and FTR getting the charge reduced ISN'T being found innocent.
Did I say getting the charge reduced was saying he was innocent, I can't seem to see that part in my post. I was just stating that there are a lot of DUI cases that get dismissed or reduced in response to your post where you said there was not a snowballs chance in hell.

 
I won't question the decision if he gets kicked off. But I wonder why everyone is jumping to support that decision when we were defending him after his first incident? If he was not even going to get suspended at all after the bar incident, why does a DUI push it to "kicked off the team"? There seems to be a little non sequitur there, even if it is a repeat offense. I thought no suspension would be too lenient in that first case, and considerable suspension is deserved at this point. But I also think if he can prove himself somehow, he can work his way back to an amount of respectability that he can be on the Husker team again. I don't know - I don't know any prior examples of players getting DUIs.
Speak for yourself, I know myself and a few others weren't defending him after his first incident.

 
Did I say getting the charge reduced was saying he was innocent, I can't seem to see that part in my post. I was just stating that there are a lot of DUI cases that get dismissed or reduced in response to your post where you said there was not a snowballs chance in hell.
Perhaps you should re-read the original post then.

Are you kidding me?

Fact: He was driving.

Fact: He was drunk.

He doesn't have a snowball's chance in H-E-double hockey sticks of being found innocent. I doubt this will even go to trial.
I never said there wasn't a snowballs chance in hell the charges would get reduced.

 
Back
Top