I don't envy those of you having to try and teach younger kids in that environment. I do some part time teaching for a community college, and there the expectations are a little different - students aren't required to be in college. So saying (nicely) "suck it up and put in the effort" is more supported by the college administration.
I'm just getting sick of having to instruct students on how to properly wear a mask in the classroom. If the fat middle aged guy can wear one all class period, the 18-22 college athlete sure as hell can sit there and wear one.
Great company we're in.
Every single class period, I have to ask at least 3 times to have my students put their masks over their noses.
I don't think what you're saying is correct since the point of the question is to gather symptoms and mask wearing right now. The statistics and polling are being conducted by a team at Carnegie Mellon, and one of the researchers mentions that there's the possibility of bias. You can also go right to their covidcast website, which allows you to look at the collected data in a ton of different ways: https://covidcast.cmu.edu/I'm not trying to argue against masks.
But if I'm making a correct assumption about how the question is being asked - do they now someone with symptoms right now - the results would be skewed by the higher infections already running through some states such that a lot of people have already had it compared to other states that are just now really picking up (kind of for the first time).
So the CovidCast team partnered with Facebook, which is used by 70 percent of U.S. adults and has the ability to survey tens of thousands of them every day at relatively low cost. While the resulting state-level samples aren’t perfect representations of the general population, the researchers weight the responses using Census Bureau demographic data to ensure they’re a good approximation.
“If Facebook’s users are different from the U.S. population generally in a way that the survey weighting process doesn’t account for, then our estimates could be biased,” cautioned Alex Reinhart, a Carnegie Mellon professor of statistics and data science who works on CovidCast and wrote a book on statistical methods. “But if that bias doesn’t change much over time, then we can still use the survey to detect trends and changes.”
He also cautioned that the old saw of “correlation doesn’t equal causation” applies here as well.
“There could be other explanations for the correlation,” he said. “For example, states that had worse outbreaks earlier in the pandemic both have higher mask usage now and more immunity.”
I think that's a fair point. It's also a bit of an interesting/strange metric to measure... 'knowing someone with COVID symptoms.' I wouldn't necessarily say it's irrelevant, but there are probably 15-20 different people who know I had COVID-like symptoms this past week and almost all of them (including me) are avid mask users in public.I'm not trying to argue against masks.
But if I'm making a correct assumption about how the question is being asked - do they now someone with symptoms right now - the results would be skewed by the higher infections already running through some states such that a lot of people have already had it compared to other states that are just now really picking up (kind of for the first time).
“If Facebook’s users are different from the U.S. population generally in a way that the survey weighting process doesn’t account for, then our estimates could be biased,”
Well....everyone's facebook friend groups are going to be different. However, I'll have to say that anyone on mine that talks about politics is squarely in the MAGA crowd. If they get bad enough, I unfollow them. I'd rather have mine filled with people who are posting random pictures of vacation drives to Colorado or grandkids.According to some around here, Facebook users can't possibly have a logical opinion, and will only provide answers like "MAGA-Duh" :dunno