Poll: Should Frost be fired?

Should Frost be fired at the end of the season?

  • Yes, Frost should be fired.

    Votes: 76 43.9%

  • No, Frost should be allowed to stay.

    Votes: 97 56.1%
  • Total voters
    173
Guy Chamberlin said:
If we took a poll about whether ndobney adds to or detracts from every discussion, you might not like those numbers. 
Click to expand...


Hedley Lamarr said:
I am sure cooler heads would prevail in the ndobney poll. 
Click to expand...
I was thinking about starting a poll asking if Martinez is the major contributing factor to all our woes (as ndobney has claimed repeatedly). I guess that would settle the issue. As soon as that sucker breaks 50% to the No side, I’ll claim a clear cut victory and attribute it to cooler heads.

 
Hedley Lamarr said:
Can we all be honest that their is in fact no distinct possibility of 7-5. If you were to rank the most likely outcomes over the next 4 weeks I would imagine you would have the largest group guessing 1-3 or 2-2 a smaller group saying 3-1 and practically no people saying 4-0. 
Click to expand...
It is a good thing opinions don't control outcomes.  While it remains possible, I will hope for it.  I'm not predicting 4-0 but stranger things have happened and it would sure make for some great excitement for the program.  Hell of a lot better than thinking about the possibility of a coaching search... yuck.  

Speaking of that, great article about one search from the past that started this tailspin we have been in... https://theathletic.com/?p=2885515&article_source=search&search_query=nebraska

 
Husker_Bohunk said:
Agreed.

When Osborne retired he should not have been able to name his replacement since he was no longer an employee of the University. And it wasn't his place to do so before stepping down and in naming his own successor he overstepped the bounds of his authority.
Click to expand...
TBF, at that point in time TO had no bounds and he was the program. Only in hindsight can we say that maybe Frank wasn’t the best choice. But at the time TO wanted to assure program continuity and had the authority and credibility to name his successor. Anybody who would’ve claimed otherwise in 1997 would’ve been labeled a raving lunatic.

 
Two of Frank Solich's seasons were below Husker standards at the time.

Three of Frank Solich's seasons would have ranked in the Top 10 of Tom Osborne's career. 

Just to be clear. 

Recruiting. Coeds. Alcohol. New AD looking to modernize. Take your pick. But Frank did some good coaching with relatively modest Husker rosters. 

 
Guy Chamberlin said:
Two of Frank Solich's seasons were below Husker standards at the time.

Three of Frank Solich's seasons would have ranked in the Top 10 of Tom Osborne's career. 

Just to be clear. 

Recruiting. Coeds. Alcohol. New AD looking to modernize. Take your pick. But Frank did some good coaching with relatively modest Husker rosters. 
Click to expand...


He beat the teams of lesser talent. When I look at his losses. Early on, we may have had more raw talent and lost to more experienced teams but we took care of business. The issue was our talent graduated for the most part after 2001. We didn't have the coaching to coach around our lack of talent. 

It sure was nice beating the teams we were supposed to beat.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top