Cases of Election Fraud
- Thread starter knapplc
- Start date
Scarlet
Well-known member
Whelp there it is. All the evidence of fraud you could ever want in one graph provided by an election expert who's been on Twitter for four months and has 37,000+ tweets. Of course with the obligatory "escaped from communism" line in the bio.
Last edited by a moderator:
BigRedBuster
Well-known member
OMG…..now I see it. I’ve been blind this whole time.
I love Trump.
I apologize to all MAGATs.
Last edited by a moderator:
knapplc
Well-known member
It'll be interesting to see if they try to prosecute him.
https://www.youarecurrent.com/2022/11/07/poll-worker-removed-from-carmel-early-voting-site-denies-allegations/
BigRedBuster
Well-known member
This is a great thread. But, it’s sad that they actually have to battle against pathetic Republicans trying to tear apart our elections.
BigRedBuster
Well-known member
[No message]
BigRedBuster
Well-known member
[No message]
BigRedBuster
Well-known member
[No message]
Dr. Strangelove
Well-known member
This is hilarious. But also sad that the Democ-RATS would cover up their systemic voter fraud by orchestrating numerous examples of verifiable voter fraud committed by Trump voters.
Archy1221
Well-known member
https://www.wbur.org/news/2023/11/02/connecticut-judge-overturns-results-of-mayoral-primary-just-days-before-election#
Superior Court Judge William Clark determined the allegations of possible malfeasance warrant throwing out the results of the Sept. 12 primary, which Ganim won by 251 votes out of 8,173 cast. Absentee ballots secured his margin of victory.
“The volume of ballots so mishandled is such that it calls the result of the primary election into serious doubt and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary,” Clark wrote in his ruling, adding that the videos “are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties.”
Superior Court Judge William Clark determined the allegations of possible malfeasance warrant throwing out the results of the Sept. 12 primary, which Ganim won by 251 votes out of 8,173 cast. Absentee ballots secured his margin of victory.
“The volume of ballots so mishandled is such that it calls the result of the primary election into serious doubt and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary,” Clark wrote in his ruling, adding that the videos “are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties.”
Archy1221
Well-known member
https://www.njoag.gov/ag-platkin-paterson-city-council-president-facing-new-charges-in-election-fraud-case-after-new-details-of-conspiracy-and-alleged-witness-tampering-are-uncovered/
The initial OPIA investigation began when the U.S. Postal Inspection Service alerted the Attorney General’s Office that hundreds of mail-in ballots for the May 2020 Paterson municipal election were found in a mailbox in the neighboring municipality of Haledon. Hundreds of mail-in ballots were also found in a mailbox in Paterson, at a time when all voting was being conducted via vote-by-mail because of COVID-19 safety precautions.
It is alleged that prior to the May 2020 election, while he was a candidate seeking to represent the 3rd Ward, Mendez personally collected a number of mail-in ballots from households in that section of Paterson, in violation of the Vote-By-Mail Law. Mendez and his associates allegedly collected many ballots in the 3rd Ward over several days.
New Jersey allows a voter to give a completed ballot to a “bearer,” who must complete the bearer certification on the ballot envelope before returning the ballot on behalf of the voter to the county board of elections. Under state law, a candidate in an election is never permitted to serve as a ballot bearer on behalf of other voters in the district in which he is a candidate.
It is alleged that many of the ballots that the campaign collected were not sealed by voters when they were turned over. It is further alleged that after the ballots were brought to Mendez’s campaign headquarters, they were examined to see if the ballots were votes for Mendez. If the ballot did not select Mendez as the candidate of choice, his wife, Yohanny Mendez, allegedly would destroy the ballot and replace it with another mail-in ballot that did select Mendez for the council seat.
The initial OPIA investigation began when the U.S. Postal Inspection Service alerted the Attorney General’s Office that hundreds of mail-in ballots for the May 2020 Paterson municipal election were found in a mailbox in the neighboring municipality of Haledon. Hundreds of mail-in ballots were also found in a mailbox in Paterson, at a time when all voting was being conducted via vote-by-mail because of COVID-19 safety precautions.
It is alleged that prior to the May 2020 election, while he was a candidate seeking to represent the 3rd Ward, Mendez personally collected a number of mail-in ballots from households in that section of Paterson, in violation of the Vote-By-Mail Law. Mendez and his associates allegedly collected many ballots in the 3rd Ward over several days.
New Jersey allows a voter to give a completed ballot to a “bearer,” who must complete the bearer certification on the ballot envelope before returning the ballot on behalf of the voter to the county board of elections. Under state law, a candidate in an election is never permitted to serve as a ballot bearer on behalf of other voters in the district in which he is a candidate.
It is alleged that many of the ballots that the campaign collected were not sealed by voters when they were turned over. It is further alleged that after the ballots were brought to Mendez’s campaign headquarters, they were examined to see if the ballots were votes for Mendez. If the ballot did not select Mendez as the candidate of choice, his wife, Yohanny Mendez, allegedly would destroy the ballot and replace it with another mail-in ballot that did select Mendez for the council seat.
BigRedBuster
Well-known member
[No message]