Rhule made sense, at least to me. He said that the internal message within the offensive side has been the same for weeks/months. His opinion is that the players didn't take Satt's input as seriously. Maybe they paid too much attention to the fans or the media calling for Satt''s job as a reason to ignore what he was instructing. Then Holgo comes in, says the exact same things, but in a different tone and presumably less friendly. The messenger changes, but the message remains the same. Harder to blame Satt if the new guy is pointing out the same shortcomings of players or position groups.What Rhule tried to say there does not make sense. There's no sensible verbatim punchline.
It's a subtle attempt to make people think that through some kind of semi-mysterious set of circumstances, things just didn't quite work out well on offense with Satterfield in charge.
Reading between the lines though, it's obvious what he really means: Satterfield is an unqualified leader, and now he believes the offense has a qualified leader.
Serious question, Have any of Rhule's assistant coaches every done anything better ? or do we have another Scott Frost...with the exception of Mario :lol:
Serious question, Have any of Rhule's assistant coaches every done anything better ? or do we have another Scott Frost...with the exception of Mario :lol:
I mean .... people constantly claimed how stupid Frost was for not having a dedicated Special Teams Coach. Then complained that Rhule was stupid for not having a dedicated Quarterbacks Coach.
And look how well those position groups have been treating us, now that we have people in those postions.