BigRedBuster
International Man of Mystery
Had to add the bolded part.So far our DBs have been playing great. If we can get some kind of rush.....while containing him......and rattle him, then that would be helpful.
Had to add the bolded part.So far our DBs have been playing great. If we can get some kind of rush.....while containing him......and rattle him, then that would be helpful.
Agree. If we don’t sellout to stop the run and force them to throw, that’s on the coaching staff. Surely they have identified this.You might be right but I'm thinking our staff and team prep will at minimum force Michigan into passing the ball, or at least being creative in the run game, from the start. I think we will have a lot of 8 man boxes from the first snap. Force the rookie to beat us with his arm.
Yep. Agree 100%Had to add the bolded part.
Unfortunately, this is pretty much where I'm at. There is no question on which team is more talented. The question then becomes whether the coaching staff can scheme their way to victory. I'm not saying they can't, I just don't know.I don't think the defense is going to be able to stop the run even with stacking the box. I suspect conference play is going to be fairly rough from a run defense standpoint. Gonna have to win a shootout, and I think their defense is going to do enough to keep that from happening.
I am just hoping for a respectable performance as a sign of growth, a win would be very unexpected at this point. Don't get blown out and keep them under 35 ish points.
Very reasonable. Reminds me of Illinois last year. Our Offense started to slow and, by the end of the game, the Defense was wet paper. Illinois would’ve scored every series had the game been extended.I'm nervous as hell, and see it going one of two ways.
I think Michigan wins if, in the 1st and/or the 3rd quarters, our offense stalls 1-2 times while they get 7-12 play drives. If we don't ball control well and move the sticks, and they get some early success, I don't think our defense will be able to stand up to em for the entire game.
I do hope they put a spy on their qb.I think stopping BU (Michigan's QB) is the key. We didn't play a spy against Cincy and he ran up and down the field all day. The field was wide open bc we didn't have enough quickness to get to the qb and our coverage in the back was great.
One thing that is different with our defense this year is the depth. We can rotate in more frequently so we should still have fresh players late in the game which should limit the drop off we saw in 4thQ last year. Whether that rotation will be as effective remains to be seen though. We obviously don't have Ty and Nash level interior linemen but maybe keeping the guys fresh will make a difference late in games?Very reasonable. Reminds me of Illinois last year. Our Offense started to slow and, by the end of the game, the Defense was wet paper. Illinois would’ve scored every series had the game been extended.
Our Defense doesn’t seem as good as last year, at least up front. Our Offense seems better. We have to score in volumes early (finish drives with TDs) sell out to stop the run, spy thr QB with a good athlete, avoid PI penalties in man to man, and be solid in special teams.
I actually think an easy indicator for success will be to watch the NT position. If we’re getting blown off the ball, no matter the scheme behind or around, that’s bad. Can we hold the LOS with our front? If we hold we have a good chance. If we actually move their line back we have a really good chance. If we get pushed back it could be a really long afternoon.
NoNU will suffer 3-4 turnovers and numerous silly and/or ref's phantom penalties against us. Plus Husker Curse is alive and well ....
Ernest will become MVP ???
I get it- you have been hurt so much in the past your trying the reverse psychology approach. Hope it works out for you.NU will suffer 3-4 turnovers and numerous silly and/or ref's phantom penalties against us. Plus Husker Curse is alive and well ....
Ernest will become MVP ???