Delaney's elite PR team removed it.What happened to the poll in this thread? It just vaporized. Sort of freaky. :lol:
Just change it to Legends & Ringleaders.They suck but I just ignore them.
Hopefully when they bring in two teams from the East they just put Wisconsin in our division and call it eiher North and South or East and West. Regardless if it's a perfect term or not.
Heck I could live with Northwest and Southeast if they want to do it that way.
Well obviously we would be in the pretentious pod.Haha, who would be in which?Are these your suggested names if we go to 4 pods?Pretentious, preposterous, treacherous, and goofy.
I like them.
Danimal said:Still say they should've went straight East and West divisions with Neb, Wiscy, Iowa, Minn, Ill, and NW in the west and OSU, MIch, PSU, Pur, Ind, and MSU in the east. I know they wanted to balance out the traditional powers but this plan would've kept traditional rivalries/trophy-games intact while getting rid of the supid interdivision rivals deal. Plus the west could likely hold its own, and down the road if that changed THEN you do something goofy like Legends and Leaders.
How silly is it going to be when Mich and Ohio State have rematches a week after their traditional season-ending game?
lakes and planes
Haha glad you went there...I was tempted...lakes and planes
Then the centuries long battle between water and aircraft will finally be decided on the gridiron in Indy
Full ArticleMcMurphy spoke to league commissioner Jim Delany, who said changing the division names is an option when Maryland and Rutgers join the conference for the 2014 season. The Big Ten will also have to decide on the makeup of its divisions and scheduling, but there might not be a more divisive issue than those division names.
“Obviously, we got some acceptance [with Legends and Leaders], but not as much as we would have liked,” Delany said. "... I think on the other hand, we said we would test market it, and we have for a couple of years. We have the opportunity to look at it again. I’m sure we will. Whether or not we change or not is to be determined. I don’t have any presumption that we’ll change on it, but that doesn’t mean we’re not looking at it.
“I don’t think when you try to build something, lead some organization, you don’t want to be tone deaf. But it’s not up for vote every week.”