huskerfan2000
-
Posts
1,065 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Media Demo
Posts posted by huskerfan2000
-
-
This from the not conservative NY Daily News-
We go from 'just allergies' to pneumonia - why not just tell the truth??
quote:
In all cases, Hillary Clinton's first instinct was to deny, hide or create a cover story. Many times, her cover story is completely believable or even reasonable. But sometimes it isn't. And therein lies the problem because once a cover story is revealed to be a lie, no one can believe any of the cover stories anymore.
Or, as Mark Twain supposedly once said, "If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything."
Um...people that have seasonal allergies can go from coughing to walking pneumonia, especially if you have allergies over a long period of time. I know, because I've had this happen to me multiple times in the past.
I guess me and my daughter are the lucky ones.. We both have had them all out lives and have never had that happen.
-
The timeline tells me there is a very small chance we stay on current path.
yeah, that damn climate, always changing
-
Correct, the use of snopes to discredit anything is a joke. How people can think a husband and wife somehow have the ability to debunk stories while being unbiased is comical.
-
For all you Trump haters..
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/correction-coming-nothing-stop-economist-210000300.html
Rosenberg says a Donald Trump win could hurt the market near term, but added that he thinks a Trump victory would actually be "pretty good for the U.S. economy down the road."
-
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/correction-coming-nothing-stop-economist-210000300.html
I still won't vote for him, but had to post this for the Trump haters.
Rosenberg says a Donald Trump win could hurt the market near term, but added that he thinks a Trump victory would actually be "pretty good for the U.S. economy down the road."
-
-
Hillary Clinton hasn't even been Secretary of State for over 3 1/2 years. The amount of attention some people give the email scandal so long after the fact, after all the investigations, and after no charges were recommended is nothing short of ridiculous. Her opponents cling to it and are making fools of themselves in doing so.
The only
foolssuckers are those backing her.. -
I don't consider Clinton an existential threat to the republic.
Hence, my arguments merit more attention.
true, I mean how can she be when she is constantly fainting.
-
Oh, Bnil, you never miss an opportunity. I'll give you that.
Didn't I see you, once again, posting something negative about Trump?
Pot meet kettle?
-
I didn't watch the video and the link is now dead, so I can't comment on its content. However, almost anything on TV from Fox is garbage. And before you drag MSNBC into this I'll say that I wouldn't know much about them. I have watched maybe 2 hours of that channel in my entire life. I can't fathom a site you wouldn't consider too liberal when you are linking to the heritage foundation.No, I think you'll find sites that are blatantly biased to the far right, or bought and paid for are what is discredited (typically with facts). I could be wrong on that, but that's what I've seen.
That is so blatantly wrong it isn't even funny! Of course the "facts" used are from a liberal site.. while trying to discredit conservative facts from a conservative site. Knap even tried to discredit a video, just recently, because it was from fox news!
The question still stands, no matter how hard your try to deflect it. Are those articles wrong?
From my perspective, yes, they are wrong. Based on what I see and here in the media Trump is constantly labeled negatively by the media, Hillary isn't. Yes, they talk about the email scandal, but it is in a "no big deal" sort of way.
I guess you can say even though the media is trying to take him down, that it is having a reverse affect. So, in that way, I guess you can say they are correct.
Oh, and the email scandal is not out of control. It shows she is far from qualified to be president, and it should, and rightly so, disqualify her due to a total lack of understanding, or caring about national security.
-
If you needed more evidence that Trump's ego creeps in at really inappropriate times...
Keep this guy out of the White House.
That is just like Hillary claiming sniper fire, when in reality it was far from it.
-
I am not surprised you don't see the difference.
The difference doesn't matter. You're implying that because he mentioned one thing, that he only thinks that one thing is a problem. That's stupid. Conversations aren't empty vacuums and go in certain directions. Talking about one example in a topic is not evidence that you don't believe other examples exist.
it does matter, but you make a good argument with this post.
-
lol, dudeguyy.. all special interest groups do this, but for some reason you
thinkpost like it is only "American Petroleum Institute".How did he "post like it is only" them? Where did he say they're the only ones?
Oh, so then he has spoken out against other groups like this one? I must have missed him railing on those groups. Can you point me to where he has done that? Thanks!
I haven't ever heard you speak out against child sex slavery. I guess you act like that isn't a problem in the world and you don't care.
I am not surprised you don't see the difference.
-
Who needs the EPA? We could live in a free-market utopia like Russia without those burdensome regulations!
Do you believe accidents can't happen with regulations? How did all those regulations stop the oil spills lately? Oh, right those were accidents, too.
-
lol, dudeguyy.. all special interest groups do this, but for some reason you
thinkpost like it is only "American Petroleum Institute".How did he "post like it is only" them? Where did he say they're the only ones?
Oh, so then he has spoken out against other groups like this one? I must have missed him railing on those groups. Can you point me to where he has done that? Thanks!
-
No, I think you'll find sites that are blatantly biased to the far right, or bought and paid for are what is discredited (typically with facts). I could be wrong on that, but that's what I've seen.
That is so blatantly wrong it isn't even funny! Of course the "facts" used are from a liberal site.. while trying to discredit conservative facts from a conservative site. Knap even tried to discredit a video, just recently, because it was from fox news!
-
Show me where I've ever discredited a Fox News article and not provided an alternative source of information (I'm not talking about opinion pieces or their TV garbage). In general I don't have a problem with Fox articles that are not opinion pieces. Most of them are actually pretty reasonable. But you go on thinking what you want to.
Does that invalidate what they wrote in anyway?Politico = liberal
Media Matters = liberal
Washington Post = liberal
Even the Washington Post considers themselves to be on the liberal side.
Oh, so you guys can invalidate something that comes from Fox News, but when the same thing is done to your link then it's, "Does that invalidate".
lol, I knew that was coming.
if you look at that link from the Washington Post, Fox is to the right like most of those media outlets presented above are to the left.
Thanks by the way, now we know you will never try to discredit Fox when they are used because they are too conservative again.
, you guys (meaning liberal leaning posters) are constantly discrediting a site because it is too conservative (Fox seems to be a favorite to discredit by some, maybe not so much you), sorry you are not happy when it comes back to bite you. -
Does that invalidate what they wrote in anyway?Politico = liberal
Media Matters = liberal
Washington Post = liberal
Even the Washington Post considers themselves to be on the liberal side.
Oh, so you guys can invalidate something that comes from Fox News, but when the same thing is done to your link then it's, "Does that invalidate".
lol, I knew that was coming.
if you look at that link from the Washington Post, Fox is to the right like most of those media outlets presented above are to the left.
Thanks by the way, now we know you will never try to discredit Fox when they are used because they are too conservative again.
-
lol, dudeguyy.. all special interest groups do this, but for some reason you
thinkpost like it is only "American Petroleum Institute". -
Politico = liberal
Media Matters = liberal
Washington Post = liberal
Even the Washington Post considers themselves to be on the liberal side.
-
The way we are playing, which includes some head scratching play calls, and the way they are playing it would not surprise me if we lose this game.
-
We are just not a good team.. just wait until we play a good team. YIKES!!
-
I'll take that as a "yes".lol, it is not indicative of Putin, but of Obama and the dems.. That is why it is being said!
So do you believe the Putin is a better leader than Obama?
What I think doesn't matter
You can take it however you want to, lol. Obama is a total joke!
-
Hitler was a strong leader.
Right, it seems most just don't get what he meant.. of course it is Trump, most will jump to conclusions and think he meant something he didn't.
Baskets of Deplorables
in Politics & Religion
Posted
lol, the Hillary defenders come running! I love reading all the excuses!