Scott_Frost_HASNTWON!!

1 minute ago, Redux said:

 

So if Nebraska doesn't count as a real win, you can't really gloat about beating us last year, HA IN YOUR FACE!

Were there people actually gloating?  I mean it was of course nice to get another win in the column (not that you would know the feeling) but I think we all wished it would have been against a quality opponent. 

7 minutes ago, Ulty said:

A good indicator of irrelevancy is when we no longer have people going out of their way to set up troll accounts to flood our message boards.

 

Not there yet!

Don't worry man, I promise the Huskers are irrelevant.

3 minutes ago, StPaulHusker said:

That's very debatable.  

Is it? Troy got 36 pointed by Boise St.  Meanwhile, Northwestern beat MSU at MSU (a good win, but not a great win) and hung within 3 against Michigan.  Troy has no real wins. 

I'm just going to leave this out there that Northwestern is a lot better ball team than Troy.

49 minutes ago, junior4949 said:

 

I know I don't speak for everyone, but a rivalry needs to mean something.  Our old rivalry was OU because beating them meant we were more than likely playing for something big.  After OU went on probation and fell on hard times, CU became our rival as they were the team if we won meant something big.  Then, it became KState.  No offense, but beating Iowa really doesn't do anything for us.  If we're looking at young rivalries and with the way the B1G is set up, Wisconsin is our clear rival because if we beat them then it means something big like a B1G Championship appearance. 

Nebraska has not been really in the running for a West title since the West has been created.  It has only been Wisconsin and Iowa.  So I think your point is invalid that Iowa is not a big game for Nebraska.  To get to the BIG Championship, you have to go through Iowa.  However, Iowa does not have to go through Nebraska since they have been irrelevant in recent years.