Jump to content


Johhny_Nebraska

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Johhny_Nebraska

  1. 36 minutes ago, Decoy73 said:

    I'm not advocating either way in regards to Rutledge.  But, to your point, if "year 2 success" is an issue, then why hire someone who historically hasn't shown good results in year 1, but has in year 2 at school?  And then fire him after year one.  I'm a Frost guy, but I'll say the biggest issue here is the "hands off" approach HCSF has apparently taken thus far in regards to ST.  He's essentially admitted as much.  That really needs to change IMO.  Trust the OC more with the offense and spend some time with ST and D.  

    I agree, it makes no sense. IDK why you would hire a 2nd year guy anyway, in a business that is year to year. I think you need either a young guy who is all out teams, or you gotta hire an older guy who has done it a for many years, at a few spots/stops

  2. 20 hours ago, Decoy73 said:

    We had a guy who had a history of year two success at multiple locations.   And we just fired him after year one.  
     

    Without a good special teams “coach.”  Not analyst.  I’d bet good money we’ll be bottom half FBS next year too. It’s clearly not a point of emphasis up to this point.   
     

    oh, and welcome to HB!

    I think "year 2 success" is an issue don't you? Why wouldn't you want and require, year 1 success. Special teams can turn around quickly. It's all about match ups and keeping it simply nuanced.

    • Plus1 1
  3. Posted this on the staff changes board, but it’s probably more relevant here:

    If you're not going to make the guy an on field coach, then hire someone who is doing it from off the field with success. 

    I see a lot of people looking at football outsiders stats on here. Their Special Teams stats are garbage. 

    1. A touchback on a kickoff is not "efficient" for them.

    2. A punt that nets 38 yards is.

    3. Field position stats, while a function of  teams are more dependent on O/D. You can have great teams, a bad O and a poo D and still get crushed on field position.

    4. Sample sizes this year were a nightmare so any "analytics" are skewed wildly this year.

     

    Bill Connelly's S+ for ESPN stats much better, if you can get the full rankings.

    App State, Florida, NC State, Iowa, Kentucky, Houston, & Army have been the best teams on SPT this year.

  4. If you're not going to make the guy an on field coach, then hire someone who is doing it from off the field with success. 

    I see a lot of people looking at football outsiders stats on here. Their Special Teams stats are garbage. 

    1. A touchback on a kickoff is not "efficient" for them.

    2. A punt that nets 38 yards is.

    3. Field position stats, while a function of  teams are more dependent on O/D. You can have great teams, a bad O and a poo D and still get crushed on field position.

    4. Sample sizes this year were a nightmare so any "analytics" are skewed wildly this year.

     

    Bill Connelly's S+ for ESPN stats much better, if you can get the full rankings.

    App State, Florida, NC State, Iowa, Kentucky Houston, & Army have been the best teams on SPT this year.

    • Plus1 1
×
×
  • Create New...