pubes

1 hour ago, ZRod said:

How is camo at all an appropriate way to remember 9/11? Pretty f#&%ed up if you think about it.

It’s pure f*cking trash honestly. It’s not even the pattern used by the military at the time and the grey on white or whatever you want to call it looks like you’re trying to sneak up on a f*cking yeti. 
The convolution regarding the “throwback” logo and font completely detracts from whatever tribute they’re allegedly attempt to pay.

this entire thing embodies the entire unfocused and comical (not to me but nationally) state of this program. 

What happened at Baylor is permissible but this isn’t. F*ck you NCAA. 

3 hours ago, PasstheDamnBallGuy said:

I can't remember which of these threads it was in but someone on Twitter looked at the actual numbers and adding OU and Texas barely puts the SEC over the B1G in tv revenue. I think people are overestimating the SEC or underestimating the B1G. It would not take too much of a revenue bump from a merger to put us back at #1. UT got a network deal because ESPN f#&%ed up plain and simple. They are hemorrhaging money on that deal big time. There is a reason they are trying everything they can to dump it. 

this is so accurate.

espn/Disney are doing all kinds of stuff (owe big 12 money-kill big 12) and fox is behind the “merger” talks. But the big ten hangs with the sec after the addition of ut/ou. 

I also took anatomy at uncle touchy’s naked puzzlebasement college of hair design. 

how do I delet post 

Let’s not forget his recent stint at LSU and how that ended for him. I’d like to believe that if he could have kept his attitude in check than he could have been successful but I do not believe that. LSU’s defense was insanely horrible. 

I’ve been to one of Harrison becks camps 

1 hour ago, Stumpy1 said:

Dan Lust sounds like a porn name.  

Dan Lusk?

more like Dong Lust

Just got a text from an NU insider:

Dan Lust has been sentenced to spend two games as lil red.

No way any d1 university would hire a twat like that to do anything. 
dan if you’re reading this- you are a douche. 

1 hour ago, Toe said:

Do we even know where that photo was supposedly shot? Also notice the shamrock in the window, which would suggest that this was shot around St. Patrick's day. Still smells like BS to me.

 

Edit: Ahh, I missed this tweet, which is where the pic supposedly came from.

 

All kidding aside wtf is going on?

An off campus throwback (OU logo with an N?) patriotic/sept 11/armed forces themed single use football jersey “reveal party” being thrown at a church? 

I’m not a rocket surgeon but I’m not following this at all. 

fire trev alberts

this is as hamfisted as it gets 

Hire Ahman green for esports

r Kelly for watersports

now Nebraska is a real big ten program. 

1 hour ago, admo said:

Which game are we wearing all-whites

Offense in all white

Defense in all green

how many ex players can we bring on as coaches/athletic directors/ recruiting gurus/ ceos/ Peter brothers as social media/women’s rights advocate specialists? 
big ten/pac 12 combing 

drunk

forgort where I was going with this continuation of message board sarcasm 

His offer list is shocking considering his woefully unimpressive physique. Sometimes I believe a player’s exposure in camps can lead to offers even when the talent just isn’t there. Reminds me of marcel Jones 

I believe the more relevant question is what does growth of the SEC mean for recruiting in regard to a recruit’s NIL?

people talk about tv exposure and blah blah… eff that.

A recruit doesn’t need tv to make money, they have social media. An SEC recruit probably has higher endorsement value than that of a recruit in the big ten. 
that’s why Texas and OU are making their moves. The potential market value of the big twelve is trash. the SEC is $$$ city to recruits/players. Bottom barrel rape scandal Baylor “fans” (yes f*ck Baylor) aren’t payin like even zero dollar having ole miss fans. 
 

this begs me to as the question- what is Nebraska’s market value to high profile recruits and why would they focus Nebraska? 

I might be the only one but I wish the big twelve had stuck around as it is was long enough for this to happen with UT, OU and UNL going to the nationally perceived best conference together.

Omar Manning locked in…

im not even going to waste my time in comparing this to statements made last year but I have a feeling they were similar. 
I don’t mind coaches and their minimalist bullsh*t but honestly does anyone know why a persons expectations of this player should be any different than last year? Lots of rumor and speculation but any facts? 
 

also enjoyed trev’s comments and realistic views. 

11 hours ago, Decked said:

We will not be getting a superstar player as it sits. Pastore I could see being a 84/85. 

I think the dude is better that that. Ive been optimistic about Nebraska oline recruits before. I don’t want to name them because it takes away from my enthusiasm.
 

id really like to see this guy sign for Nebraska and stick it through. 
I’d actually say that this guy is most important recruit in the class. He’s a good prospect at his position and Nebraska needs him. 

I hate this board

i hate Scott frost 

I hate bill moos

i hate bill moos’s replacement

i hate the boosters

i hate whoever the chancellor is

i hate the players

i hate the recruits

and yet somehow I still love husker football 

2 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

I wouldn't say this year greatly exceeds last year.

 

Fidone

Prochazka

Carnie

Haarberg

Betz

Rollins

 

You’re probably right. I’m butthurt about the kid from hays. He’s a baller. 

36 minutes ago, gossamorharpy said:

Your only valid point is the misses on the local players... at least its for positions were pretty well set in for the foreseeable future.

 

You also seem to have a very narrow minded view on the state of this recruiting class.  We're an insanely young team and we simply dont have the scholarship room we do in a typical year given the extra year given with covid coupled with how young this team is from a freshman-soph standpoint.  This might change depending on what the ncaa decides on scholly limits during this weird period but hasnt yet

 

Realistically speaking, its probably impossible for us to finish in the top 30 this year if its to be as small as a class as its looking like.

 

sure, a few more wins for frosty prolly would equate to a couple extra recruits but there are way more variables at play influencing the state of recruiting beyond a few misses locally and few current signees. 

 

I’m well aware of the current roster as well as the disbursement regarding class. 
247 has Nebraska’s class as being ranked 57th in the country with seven recruits with unimpressive offer lists and fairly lackluster displays of talent. 
I’ve heard the class size argument many times and I still believe this years recruitment has been extraordinarily dismal. 

1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said:

I agree.  It can be frustrating as a Husker fan.  But, you have to dig deeper in the various situations to realize what is really going on....and it's not all about "Husker coaches suck".

People tend to be extremely short sighted when it comes to recruiting in general. I do believe this year’s local talent level has greatly exceeded that of the recent passed few years. The on field product and lack of presence in the nfl is very difficult to overlook and these players received a great deal of attention from prominent national programs. 

perhaps if the local players were a little worse this year they would have ended up at Nebraska…

I think it’s reasonable to say that fidone’s presence at the position could have been an influential factor in this players decision but goddamnit this staff has missed on the local talent this year. 

thre:eeve