Jump to content


Kayvan

Members
  • Posts

    372
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kayvan

  1. 9 minutes ago, lo country said:

    All I will say is fire Satterfield.  You are the OC and QB coach.  You are with the guys every day.  And some how, none have improved.  All 3 are mistake prone.  Blame it on OL, wr execution etc. BUT at the end of the day you know the ability of your guys.  Throwing into the end zone, with time left on the clock, with a QB who hasn't played all season was one of the dumbest play calls I have seen.  The running game was working.  Run for the TD.  if it's 4th and goal, kick the FG.  Less time on the clock.  Maryland couldn't eat clock in laying up for a FG.   Satt appears to think he is the smartest guy in the room, but he just showed why he needs to be let go.  Rhule preaches accountability. Now show it,  Satt just isn't cut out to be the OC of a P5 program.  See ya.

    Yeah, I’ve defended him all year. Can’t do it anymore. You run on third, kick the field goal, win the game. Terrible play calling. And unfortunately, I need to throw harsh criticism at Rhule for the first time for letting this happen. Unacceptable. I don’t care who the players are on offense. 

    • TBH 1
  2. Just now, Scarlet said:

    Do we have a 96 yard drive in us?

    Let’s get a false start, half the distance to the goal line, and then go 98 yards! We can do this.

    Just now, Scarlet said:

    Do we have a 96 yard drive in us?

    Let’s get a false start, half the distance to the goal line, and then go 98 yards! We can do this.

    Just now, Scarlet said:

    Do we have a 96 yard drive in us?

    Let’s get a false start, half the distance to the goal line, and then go 98 yards! We can do this.

    Just now, Scarlet said:

    Do we have a 96 yard drive in us?

    Let’s get a false start, half the distance to the goal line, and then go 98 yards! We can do this.

    Just now, Kayvan said:

    Let’s get a false start, half the distance to the goal line, and then go 98 yards! We can do this.

    Let’s get a false start, half the distance to the goal line, and then go 98 yards! We can do this.

    Let’s get a false start, half the distance to the goal line, and then go 98 yards! We can do this.

    Let’s get a false start, half the distance to the goal line, and then go 98 yards! We can do this.

    I think something is wrong with me. 

    • Haha 1
    • Oh Yeah! 1
  3. 11 minutes ago, Savage Husker said:


    You serious, Clark!?

     

    Anyways is a colloquial variant of the adverb anyway. It has a casual tone and may be considered out of place in formal or serious writing. In such contexts, anyway is safer.

     

    Although considered informal, anyways is not wrong. In fact, there is much precedent in English for the adverbial -s suffix, which was common in Old and Middle English and survives today in words such as towardsoncealways, and unawares. But while these words survive from a period of English in which the adverbial -s was common, anyways is a modern construction (though it is now several centuries old).

     

    Anyways is sometimes useful for creating an informal or colloquial tone, which may be what these writers have in mind:

    • Plus1 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 2
    • Oh Yeah! 1
×
×
  • Create New...