boach_clack

Lots of thin skin in here...

So rather than have the conversation, you would rather lock the post?

My profile pic is a pic I took at the 300th consecutive sellout.  Stop with the troll BS.  

Just becasue I dont think like you, doesnt make me wrong.  

3 minutes ago, commando said:

you obviously share that view.   why do you believe it?

I obviously share that view?  Where did I say that?  

Again, Im just asking questions.   

14 minutes ago, BIGREDIOWAN said:

Whoa whoa WHOA!!!!! You said we lacked athleticism..... are you implying if we had more black players on the field this wouldn't have been a problem?! Cause that's BS if that's what you're implying?! I don't care what post you repost from wherever, it's straight up not true! 

Do you think we are athletic on the 2nd level of our defense?

20 minutes ago, commando said:

you made the claim bobskr.....where is your evidence?

I didnt make the claim, I reshared a post and asked questions. 

12 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

I don’t think it’s true. I think anyone with half a functioning brain could look at the players who have played and come to that conclusion. The proof you request was on the field today and in every frikken game of the last 3 years. It’s criminally ludicrous.

 

And please, do not ever include me in any supposed category of fan in which you claim membership. We have nothing in common.

Criminally ludicrous? We are not in court.  

So I cant be in a membership with you becasue I posted thoughts different than yours? In common?  We are literally on the same message board.  Cmon man.   

11 minutes ago, C-4 said:

Every team will want to recruit closer to ground zero than not. It’s not racial. 

Quite the contrary, the top football teams in the country dont do this at all.  Some schools are  blessed with a hot bed of talent within 500 miles and it affords them that opportunity.  Nebraska is not one of those schools.  

3 minutes ago, admo said:

I am quarter black and 3/4 white.  This some dumb a$$ country racial buuul s#!t by white trash s#!t.

Best players play,... dont matter what color.  We a family

get the f#&% outta here b!^@h

Got it.  So nothing of substance.  Just your racial background and “we all family talk”. 
 

Did you read the original post? 

12 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

Denial of what? You saw some stupid, easily disproven theory of Frost not playing black guys because…reasons, and you chose to buy into it. Now you seem to think it’s some kind of fact. Very ugly indeed. I would add more about how a rational person wouldn’t do what you're doing but….

Why are you so triggered?  If you dont think its true then say that and prove me wrong.  Personal attacks arent needed.  We are all Nebraska fans here.  With a diversity of thought on the issues this team is facing. 

15 minutes ago, krc1995 said:

Would this be posted had we won? 
 

the cruel byproduct of losing 

 

Actually yes.  With all the “500 mile radius” talk over the last 2.5 years, its been a concern of mine. With the season opening today, I noticed a larger shift than normal.  
 

Trust me, I am beyond nebraska losing.  Im more concerned about how and why we do things as a football team.  

8 minutes ago, JJ Husker said:

Absolutely the most ridiculous thing I’ve seen today….and I watched the game. 

Denial.  Very ugly.  

3 minutes ago, hskrfan4life said:

You're talking about it. The best players play. It's just a stupid discussion. Cam, Dismuke, Farmer, Williams, Newsom, Payne, Daniels, Betts, Stepp, Johnson, Ervin, Manning. Like are you that dense?

I brought the topic to this medium, but Im not the only one talking about it.  What makes me dense? Because Im asking questions?  I didnt make the post I just shared it.  The question needs to be asked.  Looks like youre still pretty upset about the game.  We lacked athleticism in several positions.  You named a few player but there are 22 -30 players that will get most of the playing time.  

5 minutes ago, hskrfan4life said:

Please never post again

Oh no...you seem uncomfortable. People are talking about it.  Isnt this a forum to talk about husker football? 

Is there a culture shift at Nebraska?  And by culture shift I mean is this coaching staff intentionally not playing black players and inserting white players because they “play the right way”? 
 

There is this message on Red Seas Scrolls and many other tweets suggesting that the Nebraska Football program doesnt play black players because they dont play the right way and this is the new culture at Nebraska. 
 

If there is validity to this, it will hurt recruiting tremendously and decrease Frosts chances of being successful at Nebraska.  
 

Was there a point where Nebraska coaches were following political leaders on twitter? Any truth to this statement below? 
 

What did I miss?  

On 3/19/2019 at 2:12 PM, BigRedBuster said:

OK, educate me.

 

Back in the day, we were coaching our linemen to blast off the ball and knock people down.  We measured success in pancakes.  It was awesome.  This was done more with a lot of communication along the line pre snap and each guy knew who he was supposed to block.  Fire off and go get him.

 

Then, we went to this zone blocking and I remember a point in maybe Callahan's era where it came out that our OC didn't really want our linemen knocking people down.  Seriously, I remember the discussions amongst fans.  The argument was that defenders on the ground got in the way.  They wanted the linemen to move the defender in the direction he starts and just move him farther than he wants to go so that it opens up a hole.  They were supposed to move the defender more down the line in one direction or the other instead of back.

 

So....now we have +2.  I'm liking what I'm hearing.  This seems to be moving back more towards old thought processes.  We want to reestablish the line of scrimmage with the defenders moving back.

 

So, am I correct in that we are going back more to what we knew and loved in the 80s and 90s where we want or guys firing off forward and attacking the guy on the other side?

 

I am far from an expert in blocking schemes.  All I know is I loved how we used to block and I hated zone blocking when it was brought to Nebraska.  

 

Teach me.

 

Thanks.

I dont think zone blocking is going anywhere.  It is still a pretty big part of the offense.   I do believe that they are preaching to be more physical at the point of attack.  You can still zone block and be physical.  

On 2/7/2019 at 1:41 PM, Mavric said:

We must have worn a bunch of them out over the last year....  

 

 

This might be the most gangsta concept in weightlifting.  ever.

On 2/19/2019 at 8:12 PM, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

Well yeah, but when kids get caught sending nudes without the subject's permission, there are serious consequences -- like getting kicked out of school.

 

 

I agree. I have seen it happen.  Its not a big deal, until its a big deal.  I have seen kids expelled for the entire year.

5 minutes ago, Moiraine said:

 

 

Neither myself nor macroboy said kids aren’t sending nudes, so this reply confuses me. 

.  I was agreeing with your post and making the point to macroboy that stuff like this happens all of the time and is now a part of adolescent culture

2 minutes ago, brophog said:

 

Of what we know of Mo’s life, it would not be a good for him, and likely those around him, for him to be removed. He’s getting the kind of structure, and with a coach like Held, tough love, that he hasn’t had. I know a lot of people think that’s unfair, after all athletics can be very rewarding, but sports programs have also done a lot to help kids transition into productive adults.

 

Well said.

On 2/15/2019 at 9:07 PM, Moiraine said:

 

 

It's gross that you're attempting to oversimplify this and ignore relevant details.

 

a) He likely didn't know it was a video of an alleged sex assault. No one else viewing it, including the police and the school, seems to have come to the conclusion it was a video of sex assault.

b) Even the law differentiates between the punishments for child porn depending on how old you are in many states (including Nebraska, btw). I'm sorry if this rationalization is gross to you, but an 18 year old having a video of his ex girlfriend when she was 15 that he received when he was 16 is not the same as a 60 year old having child porn videos of 8 year olds. But you're lumping them together by saying it's gross to add nuance to the discussion and that "child porn sex assault" should be the end of it.

On 2/15/2019 at 8:03 PM, macroboy said:

People need to stop saying this is something every high school kid does. 

 

Sending nudes, which they shouldn't be doing, is completely different than child porn sex assault videos. 

 

Even if it was consensual it's still very different then what you are trying to rationalize it as. 

 

Just stop, it's gross. Shame.

You are aware that there are "Send Nudes" gifs that creatively display ways to spell out "send nudes".  It is naive to think that teenagers aren't passing around nude photos.   As a parent of teenagers and a former teacher, you would be surprised at the things you come across at school.  Unfortunately now it is all electronic so it travels much faster.  Sounds like someone is living in a bubble. 

6 hours ago, Dewiz said:

I listen to 590 from 3:30-4:30 during my drive from picking up the kids from school cause that’s the only station that comes in clear where I live.

 

It’s unbearable listening to Joe “Ok” Quinn because every sentence he says has to end it with “Ok” and this past week has been unbearable with his take on this Washington situation.

I dont listen to 1620.  They mostly ramble.  

The focus should be shifted towards the young men in the video who committed this terrible act. 

Curious, why were the parent monitoring her text messages?

If she broke up with him and the 2 hadnt spoken in years, why reach out? 

California revenge porn penalties

PC 647(j)(4) makes revenge porn a misdemeanor in California law.⁹

The basic penalties for a first offense are:

• Misdemeanor (summary) probation;
• Up to six (6) months in county jail; and/or
• A fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000).¹⁰

But the penalties increase to up to one (1) year in county jail, and/or a fine of up to two thousand dollars ($2,000), if either of the following is true:

1. You have one (1) or more prior convictions for revenge porn or Penal Code 647 invasion of privacy; or
2. The victim of the revenge porn was a minor (in which case you may also need to worry about charges under California's child pornography laws).¹¹