Jump to content


Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'cherry picking penalties'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Sports
    • Husker Football
    • Football Recruiting
    • Husker Volleyball
    • Husker Basketball
    • Husker Baseball
    • Other Husker Sports
    • The Big Ten
    • Other Sports
  • Other Stuff
    • Big Red Lounge: Official BS Forum
    • Politics & Religion
    • Tech Central - Computers, Games, Phones, A/V, etc.
    • Contest Crib
    • Board Feedback

Categories

  • Board Info
  • Husker Info
  • Season Archives
    • 2011
    • 2012

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


MSN


Website URL


Yahoo


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. I have to say, all the whining going on up in Michigan these days is really disappointing. Michigan's argument about how they would of won if Dennard wasn't injured is akin to a junk bond investor bragging about beating the average if his chips all fall right. Guess what, you had four years to build up a team around Dennard, but you didn't.. the only one to blame is themselves. With Michigan State.. wow.. cherry picking bad penalties as a justification for why you should of won is just ridiculous. Guess what, hitting a defenseless offensive player on an interception is against the rules.. in fact, the rule is called the Sapp rule in the NFL. Even if we getting rid of penalties in the game and giving them points, by my estimates, we still win by a point (or if we go to overtime, by more). For example, taking 4 off of MSU's score to counter the late hit penalty, but adding the 7 for the pick 6 still leaves them in the hole by a point. GET OVER IT.. babies. While I'm at it.. Nebraska would of crushed Michigan in 97. That is all.
×
×
  • Create New...