Saunders
Heisman Trophy Winner
Athlon Sports
Oregon’s streak of seven consecutive double-digit win seasons ended in 2015. However, the Ducks weren’t too far off their usual tally, as coach Mark Helfrich’s team finished 9-4 and suffered three of the four losses by a touchdown or less. As the focus shifts to 2016, Oregon has work to do in order to catch Stanford and Washington in the Pac-12 North this year. The Ducks are hoping a FCS graduate transfer (Dakota Prukop) is the right answer at quarterback, while the defense expects to take a step forward under new coordinator Brady Hoke. There’s plenty of talent in the program, and Oregon catches Stanford and Washington in Autzen Stadium this year. The development of Prukop and improvement on defense will determine just how high Helfrich’s Ducks fly in the North in 2016.
National Forecast - #24
Pac 12 North Prediction - #3
http://athlonsports.com/college-football/top-25/oregon-ducks-2016-preview-and-prediction
CollegeFootballNews.com
After failing to win at least 10 games for the first time since Mike Bellotti was still on staff in 2007, Oregon is looking to recapture its championship form.
Last year was a strange one in Eugene, marked by an uncharacteristically rocky start, a torrid regular season finish and an Alamo Bowl collapse to TCU. There was a general lack of consistency, born in part from injuries, that head coach Mark Helfrich wants to see eliminated in 2016.
The upcoming season is a big one for Helfrich, his fourth since becoming the guy in charge. No more benefitting from the roster or the momentum built by predecessor Chip Kelly. From top to bottom, this is a Helfrich production.
Preview Part 1: http://collegefootballnews.com/2016/oregon-ducks-preview-2016
Preview Part 2 & Prediction Video: http://collegefootballnews.com/2016/oregon-preview-2016-duck-up
Ten Players You Need To Know: http://collegefootballnews.com/2016/top-10-oregon-football-players-for-2016
Prediction: 10-2
Phil Steele
Helfrich was 24-4 with Mariota at QB and is now 9-4 without him. They should be more stable at QB and have perhaps the best combo of skill players in the Pac-12. Their defense will be improved. Oregon does rate a Stock Market Indicator of +3.0 and they get the two biggest Pac-12 North games (Stanford and Washington) at home. While they have 5 Pac-12 road games, three of them are against teams that had a winning record in conf play LY (one at 0-9 OSU). Oregon was #99 in my experience rankings in '15 and slip to #102 in '16. When a team has 6 straight years where they average 12 wins per season and then slip to 9, I would usually be calling for a bounce back to the higher level, but I am not here. They are a clear-cut contender in the North if they take care of business in Autzen where they are 44-5 over the last 7 years.
https://www.philsteele.com/Pdf/2016_Top_40_Countdown/26_Oregon.pdf
SBNation: Why the heck aren't we talking about Oregon as a serious Pac-12 contender?
I understand why people like Stanford, and I've been in the front car of the Washington bandwagon. But we should be talking about the Pac-12 North as a three-way race.
2016 projected wins: 8.2
Projected S&P+ ranking: 18 (4 in Pac 12)
5-year recruiting ranking: 19 (4 in Pac 12)
Biggest strength: The fastest, deepest, and maybe best set of skill position talent in the country.
Biggest question mark: Can the run defense go from abysmal to merely below average? That could make the difference in the Pac-12 race.
Biggest 2016 game: Stanford (Nov. 12). One of these two has won each of the five Pac-12 North titles. Washington could disrupt that continuity, but until otherwise noted, the title runs through either Eugene or Palo Alto.
Summary: Oregon is still one of the fastest teams in the country and boasts a level of depth and experience that it in no way had while going 9-4 last year. Mere competence at quarterback will make the Ducks a serious Pac-12 contender.
Read the awesome in depth preview here: http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/7/1/12070546/oregon-football-2016-preview-schedule-roster
More to come...
Last edited by a moderator: