AFhusker
Banned
We agree on pretty much everything. Frank more than deserved to be fired, the only ones that can't see that are the ones that think that running FB traps 67 times a game and only recruiting walk-on's from Nebraska is the only way to win at this school because it was the "Nebraska way." Peterson is a screw up as he should have sent out feelers to see who was interested in the job before canning Frank. Where Peterson really screwed up was that he put too much pressure on the next HC (which IMO scared some people away) that he "Wouldn't allow the Big 12 to be controlled by OU and UT" as Tom did for Bo. That is fine, but when you look at the decimated roster that wasn't going to be possible any time soon. Whoever the new coach was inheriting, he would have been wiser to tell the public that it is a rebuild due to bad recruiting and that it isn't a quick fix. Then maybe Callahan wouldn't have taken so many JUCO's to fill the many holes in the team that all seem to graduate after the 2006 season. Either way Bill staying loyal to Cozgrove got him canned more than anything so I didn't have a problem with that either.I have no problem with Frank being fired. But the way the hiring of the new coach was handled showed Pederson's ineptitude.Yup. People seem to think that thinking Franking being fired was correct, while also thinking Steve Pederson sucked at his job are mutually exclusive stances.I thought Peterson was a jack a$$ and wasn't in favor of firing Frank at that point in time.
However, I've let it go and moved on. Some other people need to do the same thing.
I don't get it.
I also had no problem with Callahan being fired. But I think Osborne didn't do enough homework on finding the correct replacement.
I had no problem with Pelini being fired. And I am not at a point to say whether Eichorst made a good decision or not for hiring Riley.
As for Tom not doing enough homework, there was no homework to be done, Bo was pretty much hired after the oSu loss in Lincoln that year. He only interviewed Jim Grobe but told him that he had to use Tom's old assistants if he wanted the job. No HC in their right mind is going to work for an AD that is controlling enough to dictate who is going to be on his staff. So that was 75K of the school's money that was wasted just to hire a guy who wasn't qualified for the job in the first place.
Bo deserved to be fired two years before he was canned. He had every chance to succeed here and then some and still blew it. As for Riley he looks to be putting together a great recruiting class and coaching gets a lot easier with better talent. If nothing else as it has been stated on here before, he may be the "guy before the guy" who takes the football program where we all want it to be. But he is fixing a lot of what Bo screwed up as far as relationships with high school coaches and is opening up more avenues to get better talent in the program. I am really excited about 2017 when he has his first team with his QB and to where most of the players will be his. I expect great things from him as this staff is putting a lot of effort into area's where it needs to be put to fix the program. It's been broken since Tom left so it isn't an easy fix at all.
Last edited by a moderator: