So filling in circles is as academically beneficial as learning the anatomy of animals?
It's not so much the ability to fill in the circle, but to choose the appropriate circle.
And I'd say anatomy is pretty worthless for the vast majority of attorneys, yet competence (@ dissection/anatomy) displays the ability to learn/process and possibly to some extent a measure of a well rounded education.
Virtually nothing in the law is multiple choice/black letter.
Though the ability recall and apply case law does seem rather important.
Getting hung up on the multiple choice format (done for the sake of efficency) is a bit of a red herring, don't you think?