We’re well beyond regional draws and carrier fees at this point. It’s all about National caché and drawing eyeballs from a national audience, which Miami, ND, FSU, and Clemson do (along with Nebraska)…ND is so interesting because the market of Indiana and Illinois (Chicago, really, where the most ND fans actually live), is already part of the Big Ten and BTN.
Which means they must be looking at ND boosting deals with stream services? I know ND is a national brand but you already have so many areas covered.
Imagine, going back to the Big 12 after leaving in 2011. How embarrassed must sCUm leadership feel now! And the conference is muuuuuch weaker!
Umm... seriously?Imagine, going back to the Big 12 after leaving in 2011. How embarrassed must sCUm leadership feel now! And the conference is muuuuuch weaker!
Umm... seriously?
It's about survival. It's about financing the athletic department. It's about not leaving a single stone unturned to provide what is best for both the athletes and the fans. Why on earth would Colorado have any shame? This super conference movement is going to be the death of college football as we've known it and I'm not sure how I feel about it. One thing I am sure about though is there's no shame in doing that which is needed to survive.
I agree. If bets were placed on which conference would last over the last decade , PAC12 or BIG12, no one would bet on the BIG12. Especially after Texas and OK left. No one thought the PAC12 was in trouble until the Big10 swiped USC and UCLA.CU made the best decision with the info they had back then, and now as well.