I'm not addressing insider rumors really, but more the vast general consensus on Taylor needing a ton of work in his passing, and Carnes having passing fundamentals. I can't even count the times both statements have been doubted. You go back to Cody's recruitment, and people would not stop gushing over his out-of-this-world high school passing numbers, listening to nobody who said Cody was a complete project as a passer in an extremely basic offense that would need years of sitting and waiting to hone his craft. Did people say this because they disliked Cody? I don't think so. The same people have been very much behind Cody through his career here.
I think we all saw last year that Taylor is extremely up-and-down in his pocket awareness and mechanics, to put it nicely. Does that mean he never makes nice throws? No, it doesn't, but while he has phenomenal physical ability, he has always had a long way to go in various other departments of the game. It isn't a biased criticism of Taylor so much as a description of the type of QB he is: A+ runner, C+ passer. It doesn't mean we can put those skills to use and make the most out of it in the right scheme, even in the passing game, because as we saw also, his running opened up the passing quite a bit and involved a lot of wide-open or single covered receivers to throw to. He just wasn't going to be the type of field general who dissects coverages and beats teams with his QB acumen. He may even never get to that level in his years at Nebraska. Doesn't mean he won't be a great player, and I think we all do agree on this point.
Carnes compared to the rest of the QBs really did have some solid passing fundamentals down, but it don't mean nothin' if he doesn't "put it all together", so to speak, and really, really know the offense. It's how it is with anyone. Garrett Gilbert, Landry Jones, Matt Barkley, these guys are pretty outstanding in their pocket-passing QB background, and they all struggled early in their careers. Zac Lee was supposed to be very good with all those things too, but he didn't totally put it together on the field either. It's anyone's guess if he could have with another year starting, but Bo made the call to go with the guy who was going to be able to rip off ridiculous 60-yard touchdown runs every time he touched the ball.
When it comes to other things, I agree, sourcing is a big problem. But opinions on the skill profiles coming in of the players in question here have been pretty solid one way, with the dissenting side usually of the "Well, look at his HS stats. I don't want to believe that" variety.
What "vast" general consensus are you talking about regarding Martinez? I've seen way more criticism about his passing than praise. He's had ONE "good" game passing, and he's been serviceable in a few others. And every single time his one good passing game is brought up, the (correct) caveat that it came against a horrific pass defense is mentioned, and never disputed. This is a straw man, or you're reading way more into the comments about Martinez' passing ability than is warranted.
Another thing that is mentioned about Martinez, and which cannot be ignored, is that he was a Redshirt Freshman last year. You cannot address comments about him as if he's a finished product. Give the guy time to mature before talking about what he is. He is a work in progress, nothing more, just like every QB on the roster. We have no idea, based on what we saw last year and in the 2011 Spring Game, who will be the starter this year or next year. Could be Martinez, could be Carnes, could be someone else To talk about what Martinez
is or what Carnes
is is a mistake at this point.
This glass-half-empty way of looking at Martinez becomes even more odd when you turn right around and state that Carnes has solid passing fundamentals. zoogies, how can you make that statement with any level of seriousness when he's never played a single down of D1 football? Surely you don't need a litany of four- and five-star recruits who've bombed at this level, do you?
This is what I don't get about the whole concept of being "for" one player and "against" another. The arguments presented, especially in this case, are pure guesswork.