caveman99
All-American
It seemed to me that Gilmore was reticent to put his best athletes on the field because either they weren't the best tacticians or best blockers and unlike with Sanders, Bo wasn't going to mess with personnel decisions in that position as it isn't his area of expertise. Obviously Watson wasn't as strong as Bo in identifying these types of weaknesses.Who said Sanders didn't travel? That would be very incorrect.I think all this rhetoric about Raymond being different, in the sense that he is a technician, does a lot of disservice to Sanders, then.Sanders was a very good coach. He improved our technique greatly when he got here and coached up several players. Who ever said he wasn't a good technician is way off base. He just stressed a different type of play. And he was also a good recruiter. He had a very strong organizational back ground and was very very skilled at film breakdown.
I guess Sanders didn't really hit the road much, but nonetheless played a big part in identifying recruits, if that's what you are saying.
This is what I was referring to, huzkerbob. Not sure Gilmore had a very good record here.Both former coaches were very good coaches.
And looking at only Gilmore's time at Nebraska to determine his ability to coach would be like looking at Sanders experience when he was at North Carolina.
Take a body of work as a whole. I'm not saying Ted was the best ever but he has had a good track record. You realize he coached the NCAA all time receptions leader and the Big 10 all time receptions leader throughout his career. He was actually thought of well enough as a recruiting coordinator he was promoted by Bo to Assistant Head Coach. He also could have stayed at NU but that's neither here nor there. For the style of offense that was being run his teachings and focus were exactly what they were supposed to be if you wanted to be successful in it. The WCO is a pro offense designed to "plug" players in to exact routes, with exact timing and that's what he was told to teach. Watson wanted those receiving elements in the offense last year even though he was trying to take it toward a spread option offense. They don't mesh well together
Regarding Sanders, I personally think his recruiting results were overall decent. That being said, he wasn't the strongest results getter. He did go get Cooper, which was a big win. However it seemed he wasn't near as active as others such as Beck and Papuchis in hitting the trail so to speak. If he was putting in full effort, he was really good in getting through to the kids. I am just not convinced he was always as focused as he should have been in this regard, which is why his performance from class to class was mixed.