Dylan Raiola

Undone said:
All other things being equal, of course having “some mobility” versus no mobility is desired.

But what are we going to trade off?

We’re about to find out. I’ll be first in line to talk about how dumb we are if whatever QB we roll out this year severely underperforms what Raiola does at his next stop.
Click to expand...
You’re addressing this as if Nebraska actually had any control over what Dylan/Dom decided to do. They didn’t, unless putting control of the team in one prima donna player’s control is deemed a smart move.

It’s a fallacy to compare what our next starter does compared to whatever DR may do at his next stop. His next team may be better suited for an immobile pocket passer. We may not fill the position with a QB that is as good of a passer as Dylan (highly likely based on history). However, we will likely fill it with a QB that takes fewer QB caused and OL caused sacks. It’s apparent that Dylan and Donovan were always a package deal and one of them obviously had to go. There are way too many variables and situations to simplify it to our next guy vs DR at his next stop. And none of it was ever fully in Nebraska’s/Rhule’s control.

Clearly our OL needed new direction so we’re moving on from Donovan. That’s smart, not dumb. The rest of it was basically up to the Raiolas and their apparent attitude that anything less than perfect is somebody else’s problem.

We may well miss his arm and playmaking abilities in many situations but I don’t think we’ll much miss the overall package that entailed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top