Dylan Raiola

Has to be locked in with either Oregon or Miami. Oregon is my guess, though Miami's schedule looks primed for a lot of wins and another run at the playoffs.
Agree. When he first made the announcement the Oregon rumors took off and then a few people reported that Oregon wasn't interested. Not sure the validity of those remarks as I believe they may have been said just to downgrade our "loss" of DR. If (when) Moore declares for the NFL, I won't be surprised at all if Oregon takes a hard run at DR, if it already isn't a done deal. One can argue that Oregon has developed a pretty good reputation over the "recent" past with NFL QB.... Miami also makes a ton of sense !! He will be at one of those two, IMO. People saying that he won't land in a good spot are just "hoping" out of spite, IMO.
 
Agree. When he first made the announcement the Oregon rumors took off and then a few people reported that Oregon wasn't interested. Not sure the validity of those remarks as I believe they may have been said just to downgrade our "loss" of DR. If (when) Moore declares for the NFL, I won't be surprised at all if Oregon takes a hard run at DR, if it already isn't a done deal. One can argue that Oregon has developed a pretty good reputation over the "recent" past with NFL QB.... Miami also makes a ton of sense !! He will be at one of those two, IMO. People saying that he won't land in a good spot are just "hoping" out of spite, IMO.
FWIW, the whole family is following Oregon on social media. Could be a nothing burger, but seems like a lot of work for a smokescreen.
 
but has oregon hired donnie as some sort of consultant or analyst yet?
Not Yet No GIF
 
Who knows if this is true, but supposedly after the UCLA game Rhule received word from two other head coaches that the Raiola family was shopping Dylan around to other teams, and Lanning was one of them. Whether that impacts whether Dylan ends up there, who knows.
"If he/she cheated with you, he/she'll cheat on you"
 
  • TBH
Reactions: Toe
It is not theoretical nonsense. It is statistics. You're free to offer a different assessment.
It’s not statistics it’s an equation. He uses his equation to propose a theory. His data set is football statistics but it’s not mathematical statistics.

You’d use statistics to develop a theory/hypothesis that typically looks for correlation between values.

It’s 100% a theoretical value that was developed using his equations. It’s my opinion that it’s total nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top