Bo was handed a 5 win team with 11 win talent. Riley was handed a 9 win team with 9 win talent.
What's laughable is actually thinking Bo was leaps and bounds better on the field. Yeah, 7 years of stockpiling wins vs scrubs will make it look better in retrospect.
So Bo increased the win total by 4 but still under-performed by 2. Riley regressed by 4 and under-performed by 4. So the coach who performed better was who?
Stockpiling wins against scrubs would be better than stockpiling losses against scrubs, would it not?
Well just think, when the next guy comes in he can take a 5 win team with 10 win talent and do wonders with it! Just like Bo did! Part of me wishes Bo were still here to see his awful recruiting efforts come to fruition so we could put this argument to rest. Bo was on a major trend downward. Was it lose to Purdue and NIU bad? Honestly, maybe. He wasn't getting it done, and so far neither is Riley. But pretending Bo was actually doing anything worthwhile is just denial.
Bo was here long enough that he was playing with all his own talent. Was still winning 9 games.
Riley has so far been unable to better what Bo could do in recruiting, so the trend isn't getting better. But it's fun to assume things would get a lot worse where there really isn't any evidence of that.