I figured there would be a quick pivot from "who's better" to "well, we weren't going to get any better with Bo.
When all else fails, move the goalposts.
I figured there would be a quick pivot from "who's better" to "well, we weren't going to get any better with Bo.
When all else fails, move the goalposts.
Well just think, when the next guy comes in he can take a 5 win team with 10 win talent and do wonders with it! Just like Bo did! Part of me wishes Bo were still here to see his awful recruiting efforts come to fruition so we could put this argument to rest. Bo was on a major trend downward. Was it lose to Purdue and NIU bad? Honestly, maybe. He wasn't getting it done, and so far neither is Riley. But pretending Bo was actually doing anything worthwhile is just denial.
I don't think anyone said that. But I'm MORE unhappy with the current status quo, if that is what you are looking for.
Bo won the division several times. But, its okay, those are just facts.
I just simply disagree. I think Riley is a much bigger cancer. The futility has no end with him, and a losing mindset becomes acceptable. Much worse for the program than anything Bo did.
Mike Riley truly has the ability to take this program to 0-12 if he gets the chance to fully sink his teeth into it. Do not underestimate him.
downward trends tend to happen when you a have a ladies private parts for an AD and a horses sphincter for a chancellor openly routing against youWell just think, when the next guy comes in he can take a 5 win team with 10 win talent and do wonders with it! Just like Bo did! Part of me wishes Bo were still here to see his awful recruiting efforts come to fruition so we could put this argument to rest. Bo was on a major trend downward. Was it lose to Purdue and NIU bad? Honestly, maybe. He wasn't getting it done, and so far neither is Riley. But pretending Bo was actually doing anything worthwhile is just denial.
let it go some people aren't persuaded by factsBo won the division several times. But, its okay, those are just facts.
I LOVE being right about stuff! No matter how small!Teach was right, you ARE better at "this"
What's laughable is actually thinking Bo was leaps and bounds better on the field.
So I guess you guys were happy with the status quo? Cool!
I LOVE being right about stuff! No matter how small!
I guess if we could try and figure this out though.
Better at winning games: Bo
Better at losing games: Riley
Better at being a d!(k: Bo
Better at not being a d!(k: Riley
Better at recruiting: Riley?
Better at not liking recruiting at all: Bo
Better at press conferences: Riley
Worse at press conferences: Bo
Better at beating teams from non-power5 schools at home: Bo
Better at losing to teams from non-power5 schools at home: Riley
Looks like it is about even! But Bo still had better seasons
Bo was a cancer to the program. I'd take Riley over him any day.
Really? I have to admit I didn't do the math on the recuiting classes but if I remember correctly the classes we had with Bo were typically ranked in the 30s, while with Rilely we seem to be in the 20s. But I haven't done the averages. And of course everyone here keeps saying how he is so much better of a recruiter than Bo was and how Bo's teams just kept getting worse because he hated recruiting.Actually, the numbers don't show that. At all.
Fun with multiquotes!
:goalposts:
Better at beating Iowa: BoYou forgot:
Better at playing Wisconsin closr: Riley
Better at getting s#!t stomped by Wisconsin: Bo
Better at upsetting MSU: Tie
Bettwr at getting s#!t stomped by Ohio State: Tie