walksalone
Heisman Trophy Winner
on a Darin Erstad 3 run homer...Has NU ever won a game 3-2?
on a Darin Erstad 3 run homer...Has NU ever won a game 3-2?
Knapp, all those are tremendous points, but isn't it times like this when teams really step up? When their backs are against the walls, facing overwhelming odds? Games like this are won because they know they have nothing to lose...I love all the confidence Husker fans are putting into this thread. But the base of the pyramid is defense, and Sparty has that in spades. Their offense has proven they can score points in bunches against bad defenses. Against the best offense they've faced, healthy and with all their main guns firing, Sparty's D gave up 28 points - half of which came when the game was already a blowout.
Nebraska is bringing a very injured, inconsistent and turnover-prone offense into this game. Our O Line is a patchwork and without three starters. Two thirds of our starting WR corps is hobbled, if not out entirely. We have a fantastic running back, but he's got a banged-up line blocking for him against a very stout run D.
We start a QB making his sixth career start, whose TD/INT ratio is abysmal. Whose knee is three months off being scoped. His backup is a game QB with two bad knees, who has also been known to throw ill-advised passes. The QB who torched this defense for 200+ yards last year may never take another snap for this team again.
Our defense has played great football - for the last six quarters. The six quarters before that, they gave up 55 points and over 100 yards of offense per quarter. When Sparty has faced spotty defenses they have scored around 30 points a game. If the Blackshirts who faced Michigan show up, Sparty may score no more than 10-17 points.
But against that defense, with our offense, that may be more than enough.
I'll be shouting myself hoarse for four quarters this Saturday. But I don't think a victory will be easy, and I for certain don't expect a victory.
Give Sparty props. Offensive inconsistency aside, they have a stellar defense. And that scares the crap outta me.
Closest ones I could find:Has NU ever won a game 3-2?
Absolutely.Knapp, all those are tremendous points, but isn't it times like this when teams really step up? When their backs are against the walls, facing overwhelming odds? Games like this are won because they know they have nothing to lose...
Our margin of error is pretty f*cking thin, relative to Sparty, but I think that we've got a better shot than the pundants give us...Absolutely.Knapp, all those are tremendous points, but isn't it times like this when teams really step up? When their backs are against the walls, facing overwhelming odds? Games like this are won because they know they have nothing to lose...
Despite the odds against us, I won't be surprised if we win. We have playmakers - actual factual healthy ones - who can win this game for us.
I just think our margin of error is much smaller than Sparty's. And I don't think it's likely that we'll be on the right side of that margin.
Notably, however, I felt the same way about Northwestern, and even more so about Michigan.
So I'm not necessarily a great judge of these things.![]()
Times like what?Knapp, all those are tremendous points, but isn't it times like this when teams really step up? When their backs are against the walls, facing overwhelming odds? Games like this are won because they know they have nothing to lose...
Yeah i'm not sure I buy the whole "backs against the wall" thing. I think Nebraska will (and should) have a chip on their shoulder because you're absolutely right, nobody is giving you any respect nationally. But this is the game that in all likelihood will decide who plays in Indianapolis. Neither team should have trouble getting motivated for it. If they do, then they probably don't deserve to be in Indy.Times like what?Knapp, all those are tremendous points, but isn't it times like this when teams really step up? When their backs are against the walls, facing overwhelming odds? Games like this are won because they know they have nothing to lose...
Maybe times like when they've been injury plagued for a few seasons, so close to greatness but being dealt a bad hand. When they've had their chances against a team for two years now and come up short. When they're healthy at just the right time, focused and ready to get that monkey off their back. When they're finally ready, after two seasons of near misses, to get to their highest ceiling with the perfect storm of circumstances finally going their way.
You can make just as good and just as sentimental narratives for Michigan State. It's anybody's ball game.
. Drake is still gloating over that one.Closest ones I could find:Has NU ever won a game 3-2?
1895: Lost to Kansas 4-8
1896: Beat Missouri 8-4, Beat KC Medics 6-4
1898: Lost to Drake 5-6, Lost to Iowa 5-6
1899: Lost to South Dakota 5-6
1907: Lost to Minnesota 5-8
1909: Beat Denver 6-5
So I guess we haven't fared so well in those close, low-scoring games.![]()
3 times the day after Thanksgiving, 2 of which will go for a TD. We have several games to make up for not giving one up and are well below our season average right now.Yes, some of his punts have been ridiculously short.............this game is going to come down to field position and field goals IMO.The biggest problem Nebraska has this year is Sam Foltz. He hasn't been having a good year and I think everyone agrees that there will be a lot of punting on Saturday.
My question is when the heck are we going to finally use our punter that can run a 4.4 40-yard-dash on a fake. Seriously.
Pedestrian......I've seen a lot of stats thrown around, but I'm wondering if anybody can tell me the type of offense that Michigan State runs?
This is true. We've gone from having both really good and really bad to mostly below average.I thought we've seen a huge decrease in 11-yard punts this season.
I've seen a lot of stats thrown around, but I'm wondering if anybody can tell me the type of offense that Michigan State runs?