No, I'm buying that he (or his agent) legitimately had talks about taking the NU job, and used that as leverage. Jeff Long isn't an idiot.Are you buying that Bert earned that raise based off his 7-6 season?So Jeff Long, widely regarded as one of the better AD's around the country, so much so that he was made the head of the new playoff committee... Gave Bert a raise based on a bluff that he didn't at least do some checking on?I sometimes feel like I post all this great stuff and nobody reads it. I've been shadowbanned or I'm on everyone's ignore list.So Bert made it up just to get a raise from Jeff Long?
Oh, ok....
Bielema got a nice raise in 2/2015, not two months after the "Bert to Nebraska" rumors surfaced. Gil Brandt, his buddy from Wisconsin, was the "source" of these rumors.
Bert now makes in excess of $4,000,000. These rumors aren't an accident, they're related to the new contract, and Bert was never, ever a candidate for the Nebraska job.
I don't buy it.
SE: Hello, this is Shawn Eichorst.No, I'm buying that he legitimately had talks about taking the NU job, and used that as leverage. Jeff Long isn't an idiot.
Jeff Long is from Ohio. You have the accent all messed up.SE: Hello, this is Shawn Eichorst.No, I'm buying that he legitimately had talks about taking the NU job, and used that as leverage. Jeff Long isn't an idiot.
JL: Shawn, Jeff Long over here at Arkansas. How y'all doin'?
SE: Just fine, Jeff. What can I do for you?
JL: Bert over hea' tells me y'all are fixin' to offer him a passel of money to be your new head coach. Is that true?
SE: Why, yes it is, John! I'd very much like to hire Mr. Bienema away from the Razorbacks of Arkansas.
JL SLAMS THE PHONE DOWN
JL: JANET! Get the donors on the phone! And git me one of those ginormous novelty checks! We're goin' ta save our coach!
I suppose you could claim Bret didn't say that he hadn't talked with Nebraska and continue to speculate that he was considered. I don't believe he was but that is probably because I'd rather not see Bret on Nebraska's sideline. His interaction with Badger fans via social media after leaving was bizarre.He also told ESPN.com’s Chris Low he wasn’t in talks with Nebraska
Even if Eichorst personally sent out a few feelers, "feelers" are not job offers. Even interviewing a coach isn't a job offer.I think people get caught up on the word "liar"NO it wasn't. Changing your mind on how you handle something, whether you like it or not, is not a lie.He has plausible deniability on the Bert offer. But not on the policy change. That was a bold faced lie.This whole thing has spiraled into a lot of things.
But no one can prove that Eichorst LIED about the 2 things that Saunders was saying he lied about. If you choose to not believe him, that's your opinion. That doesn't prove he lied.
I don't drink Sunday through Thursday. But if I decide to have a beer on a Tuesday, it doesn't make me a liar.
Example...you are a sales guy and applying for a new gig...you were responsible for 9.75 million in sales at your last job...on your resume you put down "Responsible for 10 million in sales"
Did you lie? Sure...are you a liar? Sure...is it a big deal? Only if someone wants to make it one.
SE might not have "offered" the job to anyone else but he sure as heck might have had some other people put out a few feelers.
Any AD worth his salt is always performing due diligence on potential new coaches. You never know what the future holds.Do you guys honestly think Shawn Eichorst and staff hadn't been performing due diligence on potential new coaches for at least a year before the actual firing of Bo Pelini?
True. But to use your analogy; Bo asked Eichorst out for a beer on Monday. Eichorst said, "no thanks, I don't drink beer during the week". On Tuesday, Bo went to the bar and saw Eichorst and Riley taking shots at the bar. Not a lier I guess, he didn't have any beers, but.....NO it wasn't. Changing your mind on how you handle something, whether you like it or not, is not a lie.He has plausible deniability on the Bert offer. But not on the policy change. That was a bold faced lie.This whole thing has spiraled into a lot of things.
But no one can prove that Eichorst LIED about the 2 things that Saunders was saying he lied about. If you choose to not believe him, that's your opinion. That doesn't prove he lied.
I don't drink Sunday through Thursday. But if I decide to have a beer on a Tuesday, it doesn't make me a liar.
FootballScoop reported that a "multitude" of sources told them Eichorst approached Bielema first.
http://footballscoop.com/news/nebraskas-short-list-played/
This was quickly followed by Perlman scoffing at that report in the quote I provided above.
People can choose to believe whatever they want, or whatever suits their worldview. There's a lot of turmoil and one-upsmanship going on between the Roussel brothers.
This is why I personally get caught up in the word lie.Exactly! That is why people get caught up with the word "liar"I know what you are trying to say but it isn't the same thing.I think people get caught up on the word "liar"NO it wasn't. Changing your mind on how you handle something, whether you like it or not, is not a lie.He has plausible deniability on the Bert offer. But not on the policy change. That was a bold faced lie.This whole thing has spiraled into a lot of things.
But no one can prove that Eichorst LIED about the 2 things that Saunders was saying he lied about. If you choose to not believe him, that's your opinion. That doesn't prove he lied.
I don't drink Sunday through Thursday. But if I decide to have a beer on a Tuesday, it doesn't make me a liar.
Example...you are a sales guy and applying for a new gig...you were responsible for 9.75 million in sales at your last job...on your resume you put down "Responsible for 10 million in sales"
Did you lie? Sure...are you a liar? Sure...is it a big deal? Only if someone wants to make it one.
SE might not have "offered" the job to anyone else but he sure as heck might have had some other people put out a few feelers.
It is very hard to prove a "lie". You can believe it was a lie, but proof is much more difficult.a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; anintentional untruth; a falsehood.
Yep!This is why I personally get caught up in the word lie.Exactly! That is why people get caught up with the word "liar"I know what you are trying to say but it isn't the same thing.I think people get caught up on the word "liar"NO it wasn't. Changing your mind on how you handle something, whether you like it or not, is not a lie.He has plausible deniability on the Bert offer. But not on the policy change. That was a bold faced lie.This whole thing has spiraled into a lot of things.
But no one can prove that Eichorst LIED about the 2 things that Saunders was saying he lied about. If you choose to not believe him, that's your opinion. That doesn't prove he lied.
I don't drink Sunday through Thursday. But if I decide to have a beer on a Tuesday, it doesn't make me a liar.
Example...you are a sales guy and applying for a new gig...you were responsible for 9.75 million in sales at your last job...on your resume you put down "Responsible for 10 million in sales"
Did you lie? Sure...are you a liar? Sure...is it a big deal? Only if someone wants to make it one.
SE might not have "offered" the job to anyone else but he sure as heck might have had some other people put out a few feelers.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lie
It is very hard to prove a "lie". You can believe it was a lie, but proof is much more difficult.a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; anintentional untruth; a falsehood.