melscott62
All-Conference
Nobody said NE is losing as much talent as Mizzou. Let's just say for the point of discussion that Mizzou will lose more between now and next season. In absolute terms, I think they will. That said, I still think think this year's squad is good enough to survive a significant loss and still remain competitive in the North. Not dominant, but competitive.Look at the quality of talent MU is losing next year. Think about it real had, and then tell me NU is losing just as much, if not more.Well, NU will have an inexperienced QB next year. We lose what 2 or 3 OL? We lose Lucky in the backfield along with Ganz. We lose our top 2 receivers. Next year's North division could very well be a tossup. There's no reason to think Mizzou won't be in that tossup.
I have said a number on time on this board that exact same thing. I even said (almost got sick there) that KU should be the favorite based on what they return. I just wont sit here and take a jab about how MU is going down based on what we lose when NU loses just as much if not more.
NU loses some experience on offense, but they seem to be gaining athleticism. And I'd take the Nebraska defensive line over anybody's in the North. And like I said, the corners and safeties have nowhere to go but up right now.
On the other hand, Nebraska is not in a position to weather anything more than a minimal loss of talent. In other words, a $5 loss for a man with $50 to his name hurts a lot more than a $1000 loss for a millionaire.
That's not to say that Mizzou has a top-flight football program, 'cause they don't. We had our chance to show some chops against Okie Lite and UT but didn't get it done. While I'm still very bitter about those losses, I'm hoping they'll step up over the course of these next three games and show me something I still haven't seen this season - true character and resilience against a quality team.
I'd also like to respectfully remind everyone here that when it comes to the North, MU's the only show in town right now. Next season might be a different story, but these last two seasons have been ours.
I personally don't think that's saying much, as the North is down. Way down. And though you might think the Huskers are now or will soon be in a position to challenge us, the fact is you got your pants pulled down around your ankles on October 4th, on national TV no less. You're going to have to wait until next year to show that things have changed. Speculation is folly. There's no point in talking about a re-match. Anymore than there's any point in talking about a fifth down in 1990, or 'the kick' of 1997.
It's done, it's over. The future is all that matters.
If there's one thing I've learned as a Mizzou grad, it's how to accept reality. Brutal as it can sometimes be.
I just wish the melvins among you could be as objective about your school's program as I try to be about mine. A lot of you are, but the homers need to either step away from the keyboard or get a clue. It'd make for much more interesting reading.
Peace out...
I love this type of stuff on a message board. its just like the guys (i'm not picking on you mizzou, there are tons of guys here that do it) that get all bent out of shape if you talk about a game that is more than a week away. "WE NEED TO FOCUS ON CU!!!" no the team needs to focus on CU. the content of our conversation has no bearing on the game.....
anyway this is a message board, thats what you do...speculate! none of it has, can, or ever will translate into something meaningful on the football field.
I would also like to point out the humor of the "I'm a realist and you are a homer" bit.... if only we mortals could truly see the light. I can tell you right now there are a lot of those "realists" whose preseason predictions aren't looking to good right now. no one knows the reality of sports because too much changes from week to week and ultimately there is a lot of luck involved as well.