Missouri Co-North Big 12 Champs?

husker_99

Banned
That's complete bull. I understand the Big Ten where you don't play every team but we beat them head to head there shouldn't be Co-North Division winners just because we have identical records. I was watching Missouri - Kansas game where they said this. I don't understand this when you have divisions and play every division team head to head. I didn't know they did this until today.

 
That's complete bull. I understand the Big Ten where you don't play every team but we beat them head to head there shouldn't be Co-North Division winners just because we have identical records. I was watching Missouri - Kansas game where they said this. I don't understand this when you have divisions and play every division team head to head. I didn't know they did this until today.
WTH did we get a trophy in 2008?

 
That's complete bull. I understand the Big Ten where you don't play every team but we beat them head to head there shouldn't be Co-North Division winners just because we have identical records. I was watching Missouri - Kansas game where they said this. I don't understand this when you have divisions and play every division team head to head. I didn't know they did this until today.
WTH did we get a trophy in 2008?

Yes. We were co-north champs in 2008, but they won the tie-breaker. Same thing this year, but we win the tie-breaker.

 
That's complete bull. I understand the Big Ten where you don't play every team but we beat them head to head there shouldn't be Co-North Division winners just because we have identical records. I was watching Missouri - Kansas game where they said this. I don't understand this when you have divisions and play every division team head to head. I didn't know they did this until today.
WTH did we get a trophy in 2008?

Yes. We were co-north champs in 2008, but they won the tie-breaker. Same thing this year, but we win the tie-breaker.
so since we have the tie breaker, how can they be co-champs? thats like saying the nebraska iowa st game was a tie, even though we won in overtime

 
"Co-Champs" is stupid. Lets just go ahead and name KSU the Co-Co Champs, ISU the Co-Co-Co Champs, CU the Co-Co-Co-Co Champs and KU the Co-Co-Co-Co-Co Champs and give everyone a trophy :bang :bang

 
That's complete bull. I understand the Big Ten where you don't play every team but we beat them head to head there shouldn't be Co-North Division winners just because we have identical records. I was watching Missouri - Kansas game where they said this. I don't understand this when you have divisions and play every division team head to head. I didn't know they did this until today.
WTH did we get a trophy in 2008?

Yes. We were co-north champs in 2008, but they won the tie-breaker. Same thing this year, but we win the tie-breaker.
so since we have the tie breaker, how can they be co-champs? thats like saying the nebraska iowa st game was a tie, even though we won in overtime

The tie breaker determines who plays in the championship game, not who is actually champion.

 
That's complete bull. I understand the Big Ten where you don't play every team but we beat them head to head there shouldn't be Co-North Division winners just because we have identical records. I was watching Missouri - Kansas game where they said this. I don't understand this when you have divisions and play every division team head to head. I didn't know they did this until today.
WTH did we get a trophy in 2008?

Yes. We were co-north champs in 2008, but they won the tie-breaker. Same thing this year, but we win the tie-breaker.
It kinda makes me sick to have co-champs of a division. It's like teams that went 5-7 will be bowl eligible this year.

 
We are playing in Dallas.

We get a shot at a BCS bowl.

There still in the Big 12-2

They still have to wear bumble bee colors

They still play in Missouri

I would call us the winners in this circumstance.

 
Back
Top