that doesn't make any sense.so since we have the tie breaker, how can they be co-champs? thats like saying the nebraska iowa st game was a tie, even though we won in overtimeWTH did we get a trophy in 2008?That's complete bull. I understand the Big Ten where you don't play every team but we beat them head to head there shouldn't be Co-North Division winners just because we have identical records. I was watching Missouri - Kansas game where they said this. I don't understand this when you have divisions and play every division team head to head. I didn't know they did this until today.
Yes. We were co-north champs in 2008, but they won the tie-breaker. Same thing this year, but we win the tie-breaker.
The tie breaker determines who plays in the championship game, not who is actually champion.
So the loser in the BCS Championship Game could very well call themselves the "Co-BCS Champion" since they lost the "tie breaker".The tie breaker determines who plays in the championship game, not who is actually champion.
It's always been this way. Even in the BIG 8. It's not a good thing. I know MU wasn't happy about sharing the championship with Nebraska in 69'. But we had the tie breaker and went to the Orange Bowl that year.The tie breaker determines who plays in the championship game, not who is actually champion.
+1 :laughpoundWe are playing in Dallas.
We get a shot at a BCS bowl.
There still in the Big 12-2
They still have to wear bumble bee colors
They still play in Missouri
I would call us the winners in this circumstance.
I'm positive the Lamar Hunt trophy goes to the AFC Champions.Are you sure they weren't hoisting up the Lamar Hunt Trophy? That's what the winner of the "Border War" wins.
I'm positive the Lamar Hunt trophy goes to the AFC Champions.Are you sure they weren't hoisting up the Lamar Hunt Trophy? That's what the winner of the "Border War" wins.
The winner of the border war receives the indian war drum.
So the loser in the BCS Championship Game could very well call themselves the "Co-BCS Champion" since they lost the "tie breaker".The tie breaker determines who plays in the championship game, not who is actually champion.
+2 :laughpound :laughpound+1 :laughpoundWe are playing in Dallas.
We get a shot at a BCS bowl.
There still in the Big 12-2
They still have to wear bumble bee colors
They still play in Missouri
I would call us the winners in this circumstance.
yeah but you get my point. you cant have co-champs of a division. that's why we have divisions.so since we have the tie breaker, how can they be co-champs? thats like saying the nebraska iowa st game was a tie, even though we won in overtimeWTH did we get a trophy in 2008?That's complete bull. I understand the Big Ten where you don't play every team but we beat them head to head there shouldn't be Co-North Division winners just because we have identical records. I was watching Missouri - Kansas game where they said this. I don't understand this when you have divisions and play every division team head to head. I didn't know they did this until today.
Yes. We were co-north champs in 2008, but they won the tie-breaker. Same thing this year, but we win the tie-breaker.
The tie breaker determines who plays in the championship game, not who is actually champion.