Hedley Lamarr
All-American
Oh so Bo himself didn't what about his agent? Bo puts out feelers every offseason. This one was no different. Unfortunately no one wanted him. That to me speaks volumes
The article is saying that (since youi didn't f'ing read it) no one contacted TO for permission to talk with Bo, that is all.Oh so Bo himself didn't what about his agent? Bo puts out feelers every offseason. This one was no different. Unfortunately no one wanted him. That to me speaks volumes
I was gonna ask the same thing. Is Hedley in the know with a reliable source or just spewing sh#t. He claimed in another thread that there will in fact be a coaching change of some sort this offseason.The article is saying that (since youi didn't f'ing read it) no one contacted TO for permission to talk with Bo, that is all.Oh so Bo himself didn't what about his agent? Bo puts out feelers every offseason. This one was no different. Unfortunately no one wanted him. That to me speaks volumes
Then you make accusations like "Bo puts out feelers every offseason". You don't know this for fact. Why would you make this sh#t up?
Did read the article...hence why I said Bo didn't talk to anyone. If they didn't talk to Bo then Bo didn't talk to them...thought that was pretty easy to see.The article is saying that (since youi didn't f'ing read it) no one contacted TO for permission to talk with Bo, that is all.Oh so Bo himself didn't what about his agent? Bo puts out feelers every offseason. This one was no different. Unfortunately no one wanted him. That to me speaks volumes
Then you make accusations like "Bo puts out feelers every offseason". You don't know this for fact. Why would you make this sh#t up?
Market forces drive these salaries, not societal priorities.
A coach making top 15 money at a top 10 all time program doesn't need to be doing that. Unless Ferentz told him how to make extra coin by calling the schools bluff for raises.I'm going out on a limb here. This whole "putting out feelers" concept is probably something that every coach in the nation does, yes? If so, then what's the big damn deal?
...just...lolMarket forces drive these salaries, not societal priorities. How many college head coaches are there in the country? NFL stars? How many public school teachers are there? Taxes don't pay the salaries of even college coaches, the booster-supported athletic department does, and the football program is a big money-maker. Taxes pay no professional athlete salaries and the average family probably spends well more on child education (assuming a child in school) per year than they do on sports-related entertainment -- via both taxes and out-of-pocket money for school-related expenses.
I am a teacher, and you are not wrong...If teachers had 90000 people come what their students take tests and they sold tickets to watch them do spelling bees and they were able to develop a merchandise line that sold, I would say yes. Pay them 3 million. Don't care how wrong anyone thinks it is, the facts are the facts.
There are many examples of great football players from the Golden Age of football (maybe 20s and 30s) who were high draft picks, but did not pursue a professionial career because it was more profitable to do something else. Without the pay incentive, who is gonna put themselves through the hard work and danger that it takes to be a pro player?
The same thing works with being a medical doctor. How many people would kill themsleves in undergrad to make the grades, kill themselves in medical school, and wipe themselves out in residency to become a doctor if the pay wasn't great? Nobody would.
Relating back to coaching, without the pay incentive that comes with teams performing at a very high level, coaches would put their unique skillsets into something that would maximize their earning. As a society, we need to reward high-performing indiviuals in professions that we place a high priority on. How many of you are willing to watch bad football on Saturdays and Sundays? Think about it for a bit.
Yep. But then we get threads like this one:Market forces drive these salaries, not societal priorities.
And it's wrong.