Eric the Red
Team HuskerBoard
Your standards are kinda high?!?!?!56.6% completion percentage will have to improve :thumbsGame Stats:16 of 35 for 210 yards and 1TD
Season Stats: 112 of 198 for 1912 yards and 22 TD's
Your standards are kinda high?!?!?!56.6% completion percentage will have to improve :thumbsGame Stats:16 of 35 for 210 yards and 1TD
Season Stats: 112 of 198 for 1912 yards and 22 TD's
Didn't Callahan say he wants the completion percentage around 60 or 65%?Your standards are kinda high?!?!?!56.6% completion percentage will have to improve :thumbsGame Stats:16 of 35 for 210 yards and 1TD
Season Stats: 112 of 198 for 1912 yards and 22 TD's
I have heard Norvell say that also.Didn't Callahan say he wants the completion percentage around 60 or 65%?Your standards are kinda high?!?!?!56.6% completion percentage will have to improve :thumbsGame Stats:16 of 35 for 210 yards and 1TD
Season Stats: 112 of 198 for 1912 yards and 22 TD's
I'm refering to high school standards.According to the article yesterday in the OWH, it's 61.6 percent. So who has the right number?
I don't know where the OWH is getting their pct from, but his completion percentage is not 61%.Did the OWH get the percentage wrong? It wouldn't surprise me.
That's a great point. Hard to find soild receiversMore important question is "who cares?" I have seen enough high school games to realize that completion percentage is based far more on how good your receivers are than how good your quarterback is. I watched my brother's team play against a three star quarterback prospect Alex Lukus from Deerfield Illinois, and he had a horrible game passing because we had decent corners and his receivers sucked. Not his fault, but his team end up winning, because of him. That's what I am more concerned with, if quarterbacks have what it takes to win.