Does it make me a bad person if this is the first thing that popped into my head:
![]()
:lame :facepalm:Fru said:Interesting how all these cops didn't fear for their lives.
:lame :facepalm:
I'd like to hear from you how this proves that racism is a real thing? Seems like you are doing nothing but trying to stir the proverbial pot here. No posting other links to try and prove your point either, I want to hear how this specific video clip fits what you're trying to say. Because to me you're trying to push that if this individual was a minority things would've been handled differently. You obviously don't know that so it gives the appearance you're doing nothing, but trying to cause problems and continue to drive, simply put, a B.S. narrative.
Just like I suspected....... thanks for confirming my point. Your past posts on this matter already let me know everything I needed to know. You just don't care for me calling you out on pure B.S. as I've done in the past. You're making assumptions and trying to pass it off as fact IMO. SMHThis specific video clip is interesting because it shows a white guy physically assaulting an officer, and he doesn't get shot, yet we hear over and over again that officers "feared for their lives" as a defense for shooting someone, like Betty Shelby for example. She fears for her life when she sees Terence Crutcher with his hands in the air, so she shoots him dead.
A white dude can tackle a cop to the ground and nothing happens, a black dude has his hands in the air and he ends up dead. Dylann Roof murders nine and the police give him a bullet proof vest. Eric Garner sells untaxed cigarettes and he gets choked to death in teh street. That's the point. It's not a BS narrative and I am not trying to stir the pot. You have a vested interest in this matter which seems like it makes it difficult for you to see anything from a different point of view.
Just like I suspected....... thanks for confirming my point. Your past posts on this matter already let me know everything I needed to know. You just don't care for me calling you out on pure B.S. as I've done in the past. You're making assumptions and trying to pass it off as fact IMO. SMH
And just so we're clear I've got zero issue calling cops out when they're in the wrong. I do have an issue when you try and paint us all with a broad brush with ridiculous comments like the one above.
Whistlebritches said:The next time someone says they don't understand what 'white privileged' is, show them this story.
Some of the things from this story just don't add up. Did the Starbucks manager call the cops because they are black or because they came in, used the bathroom, and sat at a table without ordering anything? It sounds like the manager asked them if they were going to order something. All they had to do was tell the manager they were waiting for someone and would order when he (she?) arrived in a few minutes. Isn't that what most anyone would do? Or did I misunderstand what happened? :dunno
Not a week later there was another incident of a black man going into Starbucks, saying he was going to order but he needed to use the restroom first and the manager wouldn't give him the bathroom code. A few minutes later the black guy sees a white guy exit the bathroom and finds out he hadn't purchased anything yet he asked the manager why they let the white guy use the restroom and not him. The black guy was then kicked out of the Starbucks.Some of the things from this story just don't add up. Did the Starbucks manager call the cops because they are black or because they came in, used the bathroom, and sat at a table without ordering anything? It sounds like the manager asked them if they were going to order something. All they had to do was tell the manager they were waiting for someone and would order when he (she?) arrived in a few minutes. Isn't that what most anyone would do? Or did I misunderstand what happened? :dunno
Not a week later there was another incident of a black man going into Starbucks, saying he was going to order but he needed to use the restroom first and the manager wouldn't give him the bathroom code. A few minutes later the black guy sees a white guy exit the bathroom and finds out he hadn't purchased anything yet he asked the manager why they let the white guy use the restroom and not him. The black guy was then kicked out of the Starbucks.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/starbucks-employee-denies-black-man-access-restroom-article-1.3938440
Without reading again, I believe the same thing happened at the first Starbucks.Now THAT makes sense for a valid complaint. I mean, if this second Starbucks denied the black guy for lack of purchase, then then allows white guys bathroom privileges without purchases, then it's clearly a case of bias.
My point above in regards to the first Starbucks was: Can't a store deny a person use of their restrooms if they don't make a purchase? I've had clerks tell me that I couldn't use their bathroom unless I made a purchase. So I made a purchase. Or I let them know I would be making a purchase shortly. If the guys in the first Starbucks had simply said they would be buying coffee as soon as their friend showed up then it wouldn't have turned into a whole s#!tstorm.
Lauren said another woman had entered the Starbucks minutes before the men were arrested and was given the bathroom code without having to buy anything and that another person in the restaurant at the time of the incident "announced that she had been sitting at Starbucks for the past couple of hours without buying anything."