Roe v Wade overturned????? Draft says so

Do you agree wt the draft majority opinion

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 20.0%

  • No

    Votes: 28 80.0%

  • Not sure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    35
Scarlet said:
Let's just skip over the fact that women aren't sea turtles, birds, or other nonmammalian things, or that such things are not punished if they destroy their own eggs but it appears he's setting up the logic for a ban on contraception.  Gotta protect those eggs, right?  Oh wait, he's probably not bright enough to think that far ahead.
Click to expand...
I think he screwed up his deductive reasoning a bit. Sea turtles are protected because they are endangered. If anything humans are probably over populated. So, apparently if we use the logic of DNR programs... We should be issuing hunting licenses for humans.

 
ZRod said:
I think he screwed up his deductive reasoning a bit. Sea turtles are protected because they are endangered. If anything humans are probably over populated. So, apparently if we use the logic of DNR programs... We should be issuing hunting licenses for humans.
Click to expand...




It’s moronic for so many reasons. They lay eggs outside of their bodies. They can destroy the eggs if they want. They can abandon the eggs if they want. He’s implying (if he even thought it through this far) that people who are pro choice want to harm even the babies of those who want to have them. That’s the closest thing to his dumbass example. If he wants to use that example he should use it as a reason to improve women’s health care and reduce the infant mortailty rate for wanted pregnancies. 

 
Some of this is mind boggling 

But the sad thing is that I doubt this influences electoral outcomes in a meaningful way. 

The structural deficit our institutions impose on Democrats simply can't be overcome at the moment. 

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top