Should we fire Satterfield??

I do think there is validity to saying we shouldn't be throwing the WR screens if we never block them right.

But this is a pathetic effort by Benhart.  This play was there if get gets any piece of that guy in either of a couple different ways.


 
This is also something I've wondered about.  How many of the WR screens are RPOs or plays with other options that Raiola is choosing to throw to the screen.  There is a WR screen to the other side of the field so it looks like it was an option on this play.


 
I don't know if we found a different look or what but from here through the rest of the game our RB run game was probably the best it's been all season.  Against the best defense.

We've definitely run split zone before but I'm not sure we ran it out of this look.


 
Obviously a horrid call and I don't really have a problem with the shot here.  But it would seem that the primary look should have been to the bunch set with numbers to the other side.  Wide open short out that we could have thrown.


 
I didn't notice HH was in on this play.  Nice to get him out there on a play where he doesn't get the ball.


 
It doesn't look like we did anything special here.  Maybe just caught them in a blitz they didn't fit right.  But it was nice to see some yards from the RB run game.


 
Pretty interesting little trap look here.  And Dowdell actually breaks a tackle and makes some nice yards.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's another example of options.  There is a screen set up to the wide side.  So it would appear that there was an option to throw it there.  Also a short hook route.


 
Raiola obviously didn't have much time here.  But there are slants on both sides.  Probably need to be able to throw hot against the blitz.


 
It looks like this was supposed to be the same TE trap play that we ran earlier.  But the OL screws it up and blocks the guy we were supposed to trap and then there's a pile up.


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top