We were exactly 1 game better this year than last year (and that is because we had Washington instead of VT on the schedule) with a worse defense than the previous year. I don't see that Taylor made a huge difference in the Win column, and I've already posted many other times that Watson and the staff should be given credit for what the offense DID accomplish this year. Obviously I can't go back and have us replay the season with Zac or Cody to prove what they would have done, but I doubt the record would be much different.
You're destroying your own point here. With a Redshirt Freshman and a worse defense in 2010 we're a game better in the W column than in 2009. We're actually playing a tougher schedule with that Redshirt Freshman under the helm (30th in 2010, 52nd in 2009), and yet we still won one more game. If you don't see that Taylor made a huge difference then you're not looking at facts. We have the #35 Total Offense and #28 Scoring Offense this year. Last year, with a better defense, we had the #99 total offense and the #75 Scoring Offense. The major difference between last year and this year, aside from health, is Taylor Martinez. Now, if you're going to say that HEALTH is the determining factor you've got a leg to stand on. If you're going to say that we're worse with Taylor under center than we would have been with Zac or Cody, you have no leg to stand on, to use your phrase.
You are presuming a lot into my statements that weren't there, obviously Bo made his choice and it worked out okay. I personally think it would have been the same, if not better had he made a different choice, but I can't prove that, obviously. But my logic is that we have 2 QB's that could run a more 2008 like offense if the other went down in Zac and Cody (or even Kellogg), where we didn't have a backup to Taylor that could step in the same. We saw what happened without a healthy Taylor, it wasn't pretty.
We can't prove anything, sure, but we have stats to back up Taylor's impact on our offense - especially at the QB position. The funny thing is, you're destroying your argument further by bringing up the lack of "pretty" when Taylor wasn't in. Cody, if he was a viable option, should have at least been productive when he was given the ball. Rather than productivity, we saw clear regression, bordering on stagnation. Cody wasn't shafted by Bo - Cody was given an opportunity to succeed, and he did not.
Cody, by many accounts beat out Taylor in practice in Watson's grading system. Did it in Spring, did it this fall. Bo decided that Martinez was more of a weapon because of his feet, and rolled that way. Cody was a team player, and did what was best for the team. Cody was put into tough situations, and struggled early in the year, he kept fighting. Cody got another chance in the Iowa State game, took a serious hit and got a concussion. Rather than tell the public what happened, he played it down and did what was best for the team. Cody got called on again for the CU game, he got a weeks prep and played a pretty good game. The next week, they decide that Taylor is healthy and despite Bo preaching open competition, Cody never gets reps with the 1's and Taylor is left out there during the CCG taking 7 sacks, putting the ball on the turf 3 times and throws a costly INT. If you're the second string QB, that tells you they have no confidence in you or no respect for you.
So my concern is, that Cody will say screw it and transfer, leaving us next year without a backup QB on the roster that has ever taken a live snap when Taylor is one play away from getting hurt (as is any QB).
If there are so many accounts that Cody actually beat out Taylor, but was screwed by Bo when Bo decided to go with Martinez, it should be pretty easy to show me one. Please do so.
While we're waiting for this, let's look at Taylor's first start against Western Kentucky, compared with Green's first start against Baylor. Cody had already had in-game experience in four live games before getting his first start, including "the frying pan" against Texas Tech. Taylor... not so much.
Cody vs. Baylor:
Rushing:
8/43 (5.4 YPC) 0 TD
Passing:
12/21/1 128 Yards, 0 TD
Overall, Cody accounted for 171 yards of total offense against the weakest opponent we faced last year outside of the Sun Belt teams, in his first significant action.
Contrast that with Martinez against W. Kentucky:
Rushing:
7/127 (18.1 YPC) 3 TD
Passing:
9/15/0 136 Yards, 0 TD
Taylor, in his first game against college-level opposition, amassed 263 yards of offense and three TDs. Cody, in his first game, amassed about half that, and no TDs.
If you like we can use Washington (ranked 42nd by Sagarin in '10) as an example, since they were a lot more analogous to Baylor (ranked 80th by Sagarin in '09) than Western Kentucky (ranked 180th by Sagarin in '10), but you know what Martinez did against Washington, and it would further destroy the point you're trying to make. Fact is that Cody isn't getting shafted by Martinez playing any more than Joe Broekemeier was getting shafted by Niles Paul playing - Niles was light-years ahead of Broekemeier, and everyone knows it. Taylor is light-years ahead of Cody, and the stats back it up.