knapplc
International Man of Mystery
Is "cancer" really the term we want to use here? I think it's fairly obvious Zac was - deservedly - a very well-liked member of the team. I think it's fairly obvious that everyone and their dog expected him to retain the spotlight last year. When he didn't, there was, understandably, some disgruntledness. Does that mean the guys that were disgruntled were a cancer?
I think there were many times when cohesion on the team would have made things better. I think it would have translated to better effort, less sloppiness, and maybe a couple more wins. I could point out several guys, seniors, who gave lackluster efforts in several games last year, both on offense and defense. I don't think we can attribute that to Taylor taking over for Zac, although in Tayor's presser he's understandably focusing on his situation (not to mention, that's the question he was asked).
I don't want to quibble over words used. I just wonder if cancer is the most descriptive. And I would gather that da skers was simply making a point, and wasn't pondering over his choice of words for several minutes like I am in this post.
I think there were many times when cohesion on the team would have made things better. I think it would have translated to better effort, less sloppiness, and maybe a couple more wins. I could point out several guys, seniors, who gave lackluster efforts in several games last year, both on offense and defense. I don't think we can attribute that to Taylor taking over for Zac, although in Tayor's presser he's understandably focusing on his situation (not to mention, that's the question he was asked).
I don't want to quibble over words used. I just wonder if cancer is the most descriptive. And I would gather that da skers was simply making a point, and wasn't pondering over his choice of words for several minutes like I am in this post.