knapplc
International Man of Mystery
We, Nebraska, are NU. We have been NU all my life, 4-plus decades. We have branded NU across two dozen conference championships, five national championships, miscellaneous hundred dozen news articles covering our teams and who knows how many thousands of Nebraska publications.
We are NU.
For the last half-century, this has not been a question, it has not been in doubt and it has not been a problem.
But now that we're in the same conference, our new brethren seem intent on slapping us with the "NEB" label. Seems they're all so used to calling Northwestern "NU" that they're not changing.
Well, I won't have it. This cannot be. We cannot just give up our name simply because they were there first. We have a greater claim to this name, not Northwestern.
THIS should have been our first trophy game. The trophy can be simple - a wood pediment tall enough for a plaque on which will be inscribed the victor of each year's contest and the score, the winner gaining the right to be "NU" for the year. Atop the trophy we could place a nickel- or brass-plated NU, something simple. The trophy would travel, staying in Lincoln most of the time, and once or twice a century we'd let it vacation in Evanston, just so they'd know what it looks like.
I envision this becoming an annual war of words - genially so, of course - between the two schools. If no trophy is created, certainly the debate over the moniker will still rage on.
And in case anyone is under the impression that Northwestern is coming into their annual matchup against Nebraska feeling like an underdog, you'd better think again. Not only do they feel as if they can beat us now, there is talk that 1995 Northwestern Wildcats, who won the Big Ten and went to the Rose Bowl, may have been a better team than 1995 Nebraska.
I kid you not:
EDIT - added poll. Polls are so much fun.
We are NU.
For the last half-century, this has not been a question, it has not been in doubt and it has not been a problem.
But now that we're in the same conference, our new brethren seem intent on slapping us with the "NEB" label. Seems they're all so used to calling Northwestern "NU" that they're not changing.
Well, I won't have it. This cannot be. We cannot just give up our name simply because they were there first. We have a greater claim to this name, not Northwestern.
THIS should have been our first trophy game. The trophy can be simple - a wood pediment tall enough for a plaque on which will be inscribed the victor of each year's contest and the score, the winner gaining the right to be "NU" for the year. Atop the trophy we could place a nickel- or brass-plated NU, something simple. The trophy would travel, staying in Lincoln most of the time, and once or twice a century we'd let it vacation in Evanston, just so they'd know what it looks like.
I envision this becoming an annual war of words - genially so, of course - between the two schools. If no trophy is created, certainly the debate over the moniker will still rage on.
And in case anyone is under the impression that Northwestern is coming into their annual matchup against Nebraska feeling like an underdog, you'd better think again. Not only do they feel as if they can beat us now, there is talk that 1995 Northwestern Wildcats, who won the Big Ten and went to the Rose Bowl, may have been a better team than 1995 Nebraska.
I kid you not:
That's a post from a Scout board. Not joking."Somewhere else" an argument is raging about 1995 Nebraska vs.1995 Northwestern. I think it's safe to say that Nebraska would have beaten NU the majority of times on a neutral field.
According to the Massey Ratings (used by the BCS), 1995 Northwestern had the 2nd best defense, 18th best offense and 4th toughest schedule. Very impressive, right?
Nebraska '95 ranked 1st in defense, 1st in offense and (guess what) 1st in strength of schedule (SOS).
The Howell Ratings (another rating system) ranks Nebraska 1st overall but rates Northwestern's schedule as the toughest (Nebraska's schedule rates 24th).
In other words, there is some debate about the strength of schedule, but is it enough to bridge the apparent gap between the 2 "Who Would be NUs"?
Using a simulation program, I ran 500 iterations of the NU vs. UNL matchup on a neutral field AND accounting for strength of schedule -- I used Howell's SOS, which favored NU. This program sees Nebraska as the overwhelming favorite, with the Huskers having won 95% of the time. The average final score was 33-13.
If you decide that SOS is a confound because the 2 computer rating systems disagree, look at the raw numbers:
Nebraska: Huskers PPG: 53.2, Opponent PPG: 14.5
Northwestern: 'Cats PPG: 25.9, Opponent PPG: 15.1
Northwestern scored fewer points per game and allowed more points per game than did UNL. If you accept that maybe NU's schedule was 1st and Nebraska's "only" 24th (though Massey disagrees), the offensive disparity is way too great for Northwestern to overcome.
Would anybody like me to run other simulations to end ridiculous arguments at "other places"?
EDIT - added poll. Polls are so much fun.
Last edited by a moderator: