StPaulHusker
Banned
I have a lot of respect for Bud Foster but I am beginning to wonder why he hasn't had a HC job yet.Or Bud FosterOr Pat Narduzzi. I'd take his defense any day of the week.Kirby Smart
I have a lot of respect for Bud Foster but I am beginning to wonder why he hasn't had a HC job yet.Or Bud FosterOr Pat Narduzzi. I'd take his defense any day of the week.Kirby Smart
I've always thought it had alot to do with him being the next in line after Beamer leaves, he seems to be pretty set on staying in Blacksburg. I may be wrong, but that's how it looks to me.I have a lot of respect for Bud Foster but I am beginning to wonder why he hasn't had a HC job yet.Or Bud FosterOr Pat Narduzzi. I'd take his defense any day of the week.Kirby Smart
Probably right. I know he has interviewed for jobs but never got one so I thought there might be something more to it.I've always thought it had alot to do with him being the next in line after Beamer leaves, he seems to be pretty set on staying in Blacksburg. I may be wrong, but that's how it looks to me.I have a lot of respect for Bud Foster but I am beginning to wonder why he hasn't had a HC job yet.Or Bud FosterOr Pat Narduzzi. I'd take his defense any day of the week.Kirby Smart
+1Before everybody starts making thier list of coaches they want, I think it is important to look at your qualifications for him. One thing some people talk about if this person having "Nebraska ties". I don't feel that this is a top qualification that the next coach has to have. I think it is more important that they be able to recruit and coach the players they have then whether or not they went to college here or have family living in Nebraska.
The Nebraska ties requirement is pointless to me as well, I agree. It's a nice plus if we can get a good coach that has them, but otherwise, whatever.Before everybody starts making thier list of coaches they want, I think it is important to look at your qualifications for him. One thing some people talk about if this person having "Nebraska ties". I don't feel that this is a top qualification that the next coach has to have. I think it is more important that they be able to recruit and coach the players they have then whether or not they went to college here or have family living in Nebraska.
his show cause ends dec of 2016.I don't think Tressel can interview for any coaching job in the NCAA for a little while longer.
But comparing Pelini's team to Cally in 2007 isn't? Where Bo leave's the team, will be where the next guy starts. His progress will be measured from that point.Then that's completely a$$-backwards.I understand the concept of what you're saying, but if Bo is fired, it's not for what he did in 2008-2010. It's for 2011-2013. Similarly, if a new coach is hired, his progress wouldn't be measured in comparison to where Bo had the program in 2009. It would be measured with where he had the program in 2013.So, a new staff has a ton of young talent that has won 9-10 games a year since their time here and it isn't a reasonable expectation to expect a CC in year two? Why? Bo took a team that lost 7 games the year before and won 9 and then 10 and played for a CC. If you fire someone you better get someone better than the guy you fired. That isn't unreasonable is it???
Thanks, I was too lazy to look it up.his show cause ends dec of 2016.I don't think Tressel can interview for any coaching job in the NCAA for a little while longer.
from wikipedia (yes i know it's not the best source)
- Jim Tressel – The former head coach of the Ohio State Buckeyes, Tressel was forced to resign three months before the start of the 2011 season for lying to the NCAA about student athletes receiving tattoos and cash for signed memorabilia. According to the NCAA, he had four chances to tell the truth and failed to do so. For this, he was given a five-year show-cause penalty (until December 19, 2016). If he gets another head coaching job before then, he will have to sit out the first five games of the first regular season of his return, as well as any postseason games (including conference championship games and bowl games).[2]
He can interview and take a job. The requirements for a school to hire him before Dec 17, 2016 are:I don't think Tressel can interview for any coaching job in the NCAA for a little while longer.
http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/56110/long-road-back-to-college-for-jim-tresselWhile the show-cause doesn't specifically prevent a team from hiring a coach, it does effectively serve as a ban in practice. Any school that employs Tressel must go before the NCAA infractions committee as to why it should be allowed to do so, and it could face its own sanctions as a result. The school also would have to issue a report to the committee every two months during the show-cause period detailing how it is monitoring the coach. Any additional violations committed by the coach during that time could really bring the NCAA hammer down on that school. And suffice it to say that most athletic programs don't want to spend any more time than absolutely necessary talking to the infractions people.
Say he wins 9 this year. What's the next guy have to do? Win 11? 12??But comparing Pelini's team to Cally in 2007 isn't? Where Bo leave's the team, will be where the next guy starts. His progress will be measured from that point.Then that's completely a$$-backwards.I understand the concept of what you're saying, but if Bo is fired, it's not for what he did in 2008-2010. It's for 2011-2013. Similarly, if a new coach is hired, his progress wouldn't be measured in comparison to where Bo had the program in 2009. It would be measured with where he had the program in 2013.So, a new staff has a ton of young talent that has won 9-10 games a year since their time here and it isn't a reasonable expectation to expect a CC in year two? Why? Bo took a team that lost 7 games the year before and won 9 and then 10 and played for a CC. If you fire someone you better get someone better than the guy you fired. That isn't unreasonable is it???