I agree, Mav. Just an observation.If Bo had left the cupboard that bare, it should have been pretty easy for Riley to recruit more than 1 defensive starter in two years.
They actually had one of their best games against Rutgers, they just didn't score much off of it. You won't find many games that is further apart between what happened and the final score. Rutgers had 2 plays that accounted for half their yardage, Purdue marched up and down the field all day. It's a strange game sometimes.
If played on a neutral field this game would be a push or Nebraska would have a slight edge. Purdue gets a field goal for being at home and another for the night game atmosphere. Nothing to react to imo... we both stink this year.
brophog said:We're both sitting here, on a public message board, saying "this is what they do, this is how you stop it".....this is not an opponent that presents a complex problem that can't be solved with 2 weeks preparation. They run what they do because that's what their personnel allows them to. They'll have some trick plays, throwback passes and such but it's mostly shallow crosses, short hooks, screens...lots of underneath routes that can be disrupted at the LOS...and that's what Wisconsin and Michigan did.
You won't find an opponent that more clearly says, do this and win the game. But the Riley era hasn't been one of adapting to the opponent and conditions, has it?
If we take care of the football, I think we'll be okay but I don't trust our OC one bit. He's gonna air it out on Purdue. The writing is on the wall and the staff will show some desperation by slinging it when we probably should hand it off to Ozigbo 25 times.
I really don't want to see that again.Or air it out on 3rd and short repeatedly (see BYU 2015), or air it out in the red zone with a cute screen/boundary pass that gets intercepted (see most of 2017), or...
I really don't want to see that again.
Nebraska is a bigger underdog this week against Purdue, then it was in 2015 against #6 Michigan State.