We All Love The Huskers & Each Other Hugs

I agree, ignore it.

Also...it seems like people should not worry so much about what Roxy posts, no need to think it is about "you"

 
Enhance said:
That's not at all what I said.

I felt the point was fairly simple and the obtuse nature of trying to twist it into something it's not is getting exhausting. We have an Ignore function and we expect board members to exercise self-control. If someone doesn't enjoy engaging with a certain board member, the threads they start, or if the engagement leads to arguments/bickering/board violations, then that's clearly a problem and the members share responsibility in managing it.

Teasing... trolling... 'interacting.' It's a matter of perspective and results are indicative. It's been made clear to Roxy that her response to this recent situation was entirely unacceptable and that there are consequences for doing such, but from my perspective, I think what kindled it all was a) avoidable and that b) the end result was entirely foreseeable.
Click to expand...




If you define something as trolling then it'll be considered trolling. But I thought no one broke any rules as I understood them, yet people other than Roxy are being reprimanded, so it seemed to me that there is a rule we don't/didn't understand completely, and I'm not sure what it is other than to not talk to her unless you're complimenting her. It isn't an obtuse conclusion, since IMO no one else would have been reprimanded if it was any other poster.

I'm not saying it's the wrong decision, but if our interactions are judged differently when they're with Roxy than with other posters, then there is a different set of rules for us when it comes to her.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
teachercd said:
I agree, ignore it.

Also...it seems like people should not worry so much about what Roxy posts, no need to think it is about "you"
Click to expand...


I don’t think anyone is concerned about “what” she posts. The only time anyone has thought it was about them is when she repeatedly replied to them referencing “b!^@h” somehow. And that obviously was about them. Heck, ain’t nobody got time for keeping up with what she posts. I can’t imagine how bored a person would have to be to even try to keep up with that mess.

 
JJ Husker said:
I don’t think anyone is concerned about “what” she posts. The only time anyone has thought it was about them is when she repeatedly replied to them referencing “b!^@h” somehow. And that obviously was about them. Heck, ain’t nobody got time for keeping up with what she posts. I can’t imagine how bored a person would have to be to even try to keep up with that mess.
Click to expand...




I mean, it was about me, but I wasn't upset or worried by it in the least. I defended someone to her months ago and she decided to add me to her list.

 
Moiraine said:
...yet people other than Roxy are being reprimanded...
Click to expand...
This is an assumption. I explicitly stated it has been made clear to Roxy that her actions were unacceptable. Not being privy to the details of a reprimand does not mean she has gone unscathed or unnoticed.

I get that some people here find her thread (and her general approach to the board) bothersome, but going in there just to stir s#!t up (which is an obvious intent here, even if it's not the primary intent) isn't the right answer. There really isn't anything additional to add to the conversation as far as I'm concerned. The board does not currently support the ability to ignore entire threads. So, I encourage people find some self-control and simply ignore her thread if they don't want to participate in a positive way, which is the exact same thing we encourage with any thread that doesn't interest someone.

 
Enhance said:
This is an assumption. I explicitly stated it has been made clear to Roxy that her actions were unacceptable. Not being privy to the details of a reprimand does not mean she has gone unscathed or unnoticed.
Click to expand...


I didn't make that assumption, because that isn't what I meant. I wasn't questioning anything to do with what was said to Roxy, because as you had stated she was talked to. I just meant other people were being reprimanded who perhaps didn't understand they were breaking any rules. "In addition to" would have been a clearer way for me to say it.

Enhance said:
I get that some people here find her thread (and her general approach to the board) bothersome, but going in there just to stir s#!t up (which is an obvious intent here, even if it's not the primary intent) isn't the right answer. There really isn't anything additional to add to the conversation as far as I'm concerned. The board does not currently support the ability to ignore entire threads. So, I encourage people find some self-control and simply ignore her thread if they don't want to participate in a positive way, which is the exact same thing we encourage with any thread that doesn't interest someone.
Click to expand...


The bolded is basically what I was talking about in the post you called obtuse. Mods are making the assumption anyone who replies to that topic is going there to stir s#!t up, so my conclusion was that it's an unspoken rule that we're not supposed to interact with Roxy, after all that's almost the only place she posts now. It's a rule I'm willing to follow and have followed since I said I won't post there anymore, I'm just not sure why it's obtuse to think the rule exists.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Moiraine said:
Mods are making the assumption anyone who replies to that topic is going there to stir s#!t up
Click to expand...
We are not assuming anyone who participates or interacts with Roxy is trying to stir s#!t up, but it's fairly clear certain people are "interacting" with her for innocuous reasons, especially when many of those same people have been complaining about Roxy in the Shed.

So, yes, when the conversation is turned into one of 'don't interact with Roxy because the mods say so' then it does become obtuse, because that's never been said as far as I know. I believe all I've maintained is the following:

Enhance said:
I encourage people find some self-control and simply ignore her thread if they don't want to participate in a positive way, which is the exact same thing we encourage with any thread that doesn't interest someone.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Enhance said:
We are not assuming anyone who participates or interacts with Roxy is trying to stir s#!t up, but it's fairly clear certain people are "interacting" with her for innocuous reasons, especially when many of those same people have been complaining about Roxy in the Shed.

So, yes, when the conversation is turned into one of 'don't interact with Roxy because the mods say so' then it does become obtuse, because that's never been said as far as I know. I believe all I've maintained is the following:
Click to expand...




I didn’t say it had been said outright. I thought it might be implied based on the post I was replying to, so I asked. And again, it wasn’t obtuse, for the reasons I’ve stated. It was a realistic conclusion to come to even if it was incorrect. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Welp, now @Mavric has also adopted Roxy's posting style.

source.gif


 
Back
Top