What Did We Learn? - Michigan

Man, there is an awful lot of coping in this thread. Saying we almost won if not for a play or two...this isn't Pop Warner. There are no such things as moral victories. There won't be an asterisk next to the score.

If we're being honest, if Michigan had a competent coach, they call a timeout and make us punt at the end of the 2nd quarter; no hail mary touchdown. And then there's the o-line; they were atrocious. Teddy was the biggest violator, but Corcoran wasn't great either. Pritchett was underwhelming, to put it lightly.

To sum up, we need a massive upgrade in talent. We aren't beating anyone worth a damn without doing so. Cincinnati, Houston Christian and Akron do not count.
 
Last edited:
Street Novelist said:
Man, there is an awful lot of coping in this thread. Saying we almost won if not for a play or two...this isn't Pop Warner. There are no such things as moral victories. There won't be an asterisk next to the score.

If we're being honest, if Michigan had a competent coach, they call a timeout and make us punt at the end of the 2nd quarter; no hail mary touchdown. And then there's the o-line; they were atrocious. Teddy was the biggest violator, but Corcoran wasn't great either. Pritchard was underwhelming, to put it lightly.

To sum up, we need a massive upgrade in talent. We aren't beating anyone worth a damn without doing so. Cincinnati, Houston Christian and Akron do not count.
Click to expand...
24 pages in, such great insight. Nobody should be allowed to see a single positive thing. Smh...

News flash. 1995 was 30 years ago.

I think if we are all honest about our evaluation of the team, we would all agree our current team would likely beat any of the Riley or Frost coached teams. That's improvement. It's ok to be a little positive.
 
Hilltop said:
24 pages in, such great insight. Nobody should be allowed to see a single positive thing. Smh...

News flash. 1995 was 30 years ago.

I think if we are all honest about our evaluation of the team, we would all agree our current team would likely beat any of the Riley or Frost coached teams. That's improvement. It's ok to be a little positive.
Click to expand...

LOL. You're the one living in the past. Why are you bringing up 1995? I'm talking about our current team.
 
Husker_In_WI said:
Buford absolutely has to get a piece of the RB, but there was also a stunt that made this one worse. You can't even see McCullough who is supposed to be coming inside of Davis here - this is how our OL needs to deal with stunts, just knock them off the ball because they aren't moving forward. But if McCullough got where he was supposed to go (easier said than done) or we weren't stunting, the back probably has to pick his way through a little slower. He just gets completely washed away, which is kind of understandable as a lighter edge. But I don't think it's necessarily Buford gap by design, the DL didn't get there and then Buford failed to clean it up.
View attachment 22449

View attachment 22451
Click to expand...

I don't think this is a twist game by that side of the line. I think McCullough squeezes down really well and the DE gets displaced outside by the C before he climbs to the LB & the playside G rolls with it. There was a twist on the other side that definitely created more space. I'd be surprised if that DE wasn't supposed to be scrapping down the line harder because Jeudy exchanges with him for the QB.

To your point, the movement worked against the D, and the backside G handles that really well by peeling off that IZ track and picking up #0. But, what should have been a solid gain was a house call because Buford whiffs. I'm guessing Shavers probably shouldn't be caught inside there by design either.
 
Also, a lack of development in OL, DL, and RB. I could see some changes needing to happen. I think HCMR will get fired before the OL coach is replaced. RB? He has had his chance. I suppose that the DL coach needs to be given some time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top