We’re allowed to pay and acquire players like everyone else now but we can’t go and disturb our existing team culture with something like that
Are you just ignoring all the transfers that are playing for us?
We’re allowed to pay and acquire players like everyone else now but we can’t go and disturb our existing team culture with something like that
once they play someone who can match them up front they are gonna get blown out. Their skill players are far from elite. That program is starting to slide a little bit.Team didn’t fold. They didn’t make the ‘big mistake’. So that’s progress I guess.
Michigan is better. A lot better athletically.
We are definitely better at some spots compared to last year. I think overall as a whole this team is more athletic. But the biggest factor is no Ty, Nash, Butler, & Sherman to anchor the DL. We are sorely missing Dowdell by the goal line. The WR room and TE room are better. I would say the same with the secondary. Special teams is other worldly improved compared to last season. OL is still average to below average.We are MAYBE a slightly better team than last year which will result in one more win than last year. Emphasis on MAYBE.
Rhule is 0-7 against ranked opponents and 2-11 in one score games. Is he earning his millions? MAYBE.
We managed to hang with Michigan.
The only thing we do consistently is play poor fundamental football.
On the other hand the speeches are 100% for the players and they need to hear it, as do the recruits and potential transfers.
Agree on all but have to add to one.Offense:
-Barney is a dawg
-EJ is pretty damn good
-I believe the trouble today were a combo of OL and Raiola. He doesn’t step up in pocket and he’s not a run threat.
Defense:
-the big plays sucked, but I was disappointed with the high volume of missed tackles.
Special Teams
-thought we were done missing field goals.
-I’m glad we got our Arch and not that one in Texas.
We got beat by a better team. 3 points looks nice, but it doesn’t tell the story. Hope they can build off this. We are still not a top 25 team. Maybe 2-3 more years is all it’ll take.
To add to the stats of my fave drunk monkey Bo (I was/am a Boliever) he was 25-24 against teams with a winning record and 40-2 against teams finishing below .500....But hey, even a drunk monkey gets 9-10 wins.... Not to derail your info (which is spot on), I think the last time we played with a slobber knocking ferocity on both sides of the ball was under Bo.Just for comparison's sake - Nebraska coaching records vs ranked teams:
- Tom Osborne 60-37-1 vs ranked teams with 58 of those wins against teams in the Top 20. His final four years he went 16-1 and 10-0 against Top 10 teams.
- Frank Solich had 11 wins vs ranked teams during his tenure at Nebraska.
- Bill Callahan was 3-10 vs teams ranked in the Top 25.
- Bo Pelini was 5-16 vs ranked teams.
- Mike Riley had only 1-win vs nationally ranked Oregon in 2016. (This is Nebraska's last win vs a ranked team).
- Scott Frost was 0-14 against ranked teams while at Nebraska.
- Matt Rhule is 0-7 vs ranked teams at Nebraska and 2-22 vs Top 25 in his college coaching career.
For the record I think Matt Rhule is absolutely the right coach for Nebraska right now. But it's clear Nebraska needs to start winning these games against ranked teams and in order to do that Nebraska MUST get tougher in the trenches on both sides of the ball.