Guy, is it your contention that TO didn't recruit nationally before the 90s?I'll stick with post #20, which you've done nothing to refute.We've been around and around on this, so I won't rehash it again. I'll just (THREE PARAGRAPHS OF REHASHING))I missed the part where Mike Riley is doing anything different.TO didn't tailor his offense to attract coastal talent. But he certainly recruited the coasts. And rightfully so.
Unless you want to go ahead and explain that "coastal talent" is your code word for a pass-first offense, a skillset that somehow eludes the millions of football players in the middle of the country.
You could also come to the coast seeking the best running backs in the country. California is full of them. Florida has dual threat quarterbacks. New Jersey has speed and talent on both sides of the ball. Every offense will need good players at every position. Tom Osborne knew this. MIke Riley does, too. Probably because it's not a secret. There's no discernible geographic speciality when it comes to football, but there are high school football hotbeds.
Mike Riley getting traction among prized California recruits who take to social media bragging about coming to Nebraska is nothing but good.
Unless you want to be a d!(k about it.
But as long as I'm here: Tom Osborne actually did listen to his critics, and nearly 20 seasons into his head coaching career he changed his recruiting philosophy, focusing more on speed, more on defense and more on faraway high school football hotbeds. As you may recall, this led to "championship" football, although I'm not sure why you put the word in quotes.
By the way....didn't this used to be a completely different thread?
CM, you are not wrong. However, neither is Guy. TO did change his philosophy especially with regards to recruiting speed. What everyone must remember is the fact that Nebraska was absolutely blessed with local talent back then. When was the last time a Nebraska high school kicked out an Ahman Green? When was the last time they kicked out a Rob and Jon Zatechka? How many Zach Wiegert's? How many Adam Treu's do we have walking on these days? When's the last time a panhandle school kicked out a Terry Connealy? It's not like we have Scott Frost's running up and down the field these days. We had a lot of local talent come into the program within a few short years of one another.Guy, is it your contention that TO didn't recruit nationally before the 90s?I'll stick with post #20, which you've done nothing to refute.We've been around and around on this, so I won't rehash it again. I'll just (THREE PARAGRAPHS OF REHASHING))I missed the part where Mike Riley is doing anything different.TO didn't tailor his offense to attract coastal talent. But he certainly recruited the coasts. And rightfully so.
Unless you want to go ahead and explain that "coastal talent" is your code word for a pass-first offense, a skillset that somehow eludes the millions of football players in the middle of the country.
You could also come to the coast seeking the best running backs in the country. California is full of them. Florida has dual threat quarterbacks. New Jersey has speed and talent on both sides of the ball. Every offense will need good players at every position. Tom Osborne knew this. MIke Riley does, too. Probably because it's not a secret. There's no discernible geographic speciality when it comes to football, but there are high school football hotbeds.
Mike Riley getting traction among prized California recruits who take to social media bragging about coming to Nebraska is nothing but good.
Unless you want to be a d!(k about it.
But as long as I'm here: Tom Osborne actually did listen to his critics, and nearly 20 seasons into his head coaching career he changed his recruiting philosophy, focusing more on speed, more on defense and more on faraway high school football hotbeds. As you may recall, this led to "championship" football, although I'm not sure why you put the word in quotes.
By the way....didn't this used to be a completely different thread?
Would you be surprised to learn that the % of depth chart players from NU and the 500 mile radius was higher in the 90s than in the 80s?
It was definitely a special timeNebraska high schools churned out some fantastic talent in the 90's, especially 91-96. That era has to be the best this state has ever had. We have had a few more really good ones come through the ranks but nothing like that 5 year span.
Although Bo's national team rushing rankings weren't obviously as good as Osborne's, we regularly were at least in the top 10 in rushing under Bo, correct?As for local talent, I'd contend that maybe we aren't seeing quite as much production on the field from NE natives because we haven't been running a system that produces.
From 2004 to 2010, we were running what I think is an ill fitted system. We especially squandered some great local talent in the mid 00's just when our B12N brethren were pretty bad.Although Bo's national team rushing rankings weren't obviously as good as Osborne's, we regularly were at least in the top 10 in rushing under Bo, correct?As for local talent, I'd contend that maybe we aren't seeing quite as much production on the field from NE natives because we haven't been running a system that produces.
And since I assume you want us to be based around the power run game, how does that jive with your quote above?
It's obvious that you would think that.From 2004 to 2010, we were running what I think is an ill fitted system. We especially squandered some great local talent in the mid 00's just when our B12N brethren were pretty bad.
Martinez arrived in 2010, but was playing under Watson's system - a system that was stagnant that he definitely sparked. The staff was gone after 2014.It's obvious that you would think that.From 2004 to 2010, we were running what I think is an ill fitted system. We especially squandered some great local talent in the mid 00's just when our B12N brethren were pretty bad.![]()
Let's focus on 2009 - 2015 when we had Martinez/Armstrong at QB running a power run scheme out of the zone read.